Sunday, 31 October 2021

Abandoned Nepean Sandstone Quarries and Outcrops in the Greenspace West of Bells Corners - Part II

 Campbell’s Quarry - Continued


In 1949 the National Capital Commission took out an option to purchase the Campbell Sandstone Quarries and 340 surrounding acres in the Green Belt.  As part of the agreement Archie Campbell was permitted to continue operations on a rental basis.  Hewitt (1951) mentions that “Campbell Sandstone Quarries operate a quarry on lot 3, concession II, Nepean township, for the production of building stone and silica rock for cement”.  It was still carrying on that business in 1963 (Hewitt, 1963) but ceased operation about 1964 (Hewitt, 1964).
        
The abandoned Campbell’s Quarry is on the premises of  Natural Resources Canada’s CANMET Research Facility.   Below is a Google Satellite View of the abandoned Campbell’s Quarry.


 The quarry is on two levels, which I have marked as ‘L1' for Level 1 and ‘L2' for Level  2 (following Egner, 1994– see below).  I have marked the outer boundary of each level with fluorescent pink.  Level 1 is being used by CANMET for storage while Level 2 appears to be clear.  Based on Google’s scale, Level  1 covers an area of about 5,900 square meters while Level  2 covers an area of about 2,400 square meters, giving a total area of about 8,300 square meters.   I suspect that the quarry actually covers a larger area and that the vegetation obscures the extent of the quarry.  
    
Alice E. Wilson (1956), M.C. Egner (1994), and Sanford and Arnott (2006) have all briefly described the rocks at Campbell’s Quarry.

Alice E. Wilson (1956, page 23) had a stop at the Campbell Quarry in her field trip guide.  She noted the joint planes, asymmetric ripple marks,  'liesegang' — dark spots of iron material,   layers of course sand and mud cracks.

In a Master of Science thesis entitled ‘Weathering Characteristics of Building Stone at Ottawa,’  M.C. Egner (1994) provides the following description of the Campbell’s Quarry:

“The quarry is approximately 15 000 square metres in area and only 5m deep. ...       Several sedimentary structures are evident in the quarry. Ripples are common on the floor of levels one and two ...  Dewatering structures were seen at the north end of the quarry and on level 2. Desiccation cracks and possible burrows were seen infrequently at the north end of level 1. Liesegang banding is common on the second level, south side, and along the second level face. On both level floors, scattered depressions are left where calcite has been dissolved. Channels are apparent in both the north face, level 1, and the east face, level 2. Most  of the rock is highly siliceous, silica-cemented, and in beds at least 10 cm thick. Elsewhere the beds range from 10cm to < l cm. At the east face, level 2 near a channel, a series of fractures trends 200̊. The surface expression is a series of parallel ridges. The faces of the fractures are flat and smooth, dipping 80̊ north. A large block of stone near the northeast face of level 2 (quarry source unknown) contained a 1cm gap infilled with crumbling pyrite. Beds in the quarry that are most suitable for building stone are between 0.6 m and 2.7 m up from the floor of level 1. This rock is buff to white, thickly bedded, lacks significant pyrite, and is mainly siliceous.  Possibly some of the fractures are faults, and therefore more detailed mapping would be necessary before large quantities of stone could be properly quarried.”

Sanford and Arnott (2006, page 60) state that “Exposed at two levels (benches) are an estimated 11 m of strata consisting of white to light grey, thin to thick, uniformly bedded quartz arenite that weathers grey  to faintly pink and yellowish green. Neither the lower nor the upper contact with Precambrian basement and March formation is exposed here, though the base of the lower level of the quarry cannot be too far above the Precambrian surface at this locality.”

Enger’s estimate that the quarry is 5 meters deep does not agree with Sanford and Arnott’s estimated 11 meters of strata.  Based on the photo of the quarry in Sanford and Arnott’s publication, their estimate seems more reasonable, but one would have to visit the quarry to determine which estimate is accurate.   The gate at the entrance to the CANMET research complex, and the security guard house, prevent easy access. 

Geologic Map


Below is a marked up extract from Williams, Rae, and Wolf’s (1982) Paleozoic Geological  Map P. 2716, showing the geology of the area around the abandoned Campbell Quarry and the abandoned Henry Bishop - Tillson quarry. 

The Campbell Quarry is shown by the letter ‘C’ on yellow background in a black box.   Other symbols are similar to those I used on the extract from the NCC’s All Seasons Trail Map that was part of my last blog posting.  The location of the ‘outcrops of interest’ from the last blog posting is shown by the red square. The letter ‘Q’ in a red box represents one part of the Henry Bishop - Tillson quarry. The magenta box encompasses the outcrop of Nepean sandstone along Highway 417, which various authors designated as the principal reference section and type section for the Nepean formation. The green square shows the location of the GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Site. The black square shows the  location of an outcrop of March formation dolostone and dolomitic quartz arenite along Timm Road which is stop 5 for Donaldson and Chiarenzelli’s (2004) field trip.   The red crossed hammers north of Corkstown Road mark an additional abandoned Nepean Sandstone quarry that falls on lot 6, Concession I, Ottawa Front, – likely the Keefer quarry.

Points worth noting on the map are the following:
- the Campbell Quarry, the Henry Bishop - Tillson quarry, the Keefer quarry and the ‘outcrops of interest’ are all mapped as Nepean Formation Sandstone
- the area designated as the principal reference section/type section, the GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Site, and  stop 5 for Donaldson and Chiarenzelli’s (2004) field trip are all mapped as March (Theresa) formation dolostones and dolomitic sandstones
- a fault dipping to the south separates [1] the Nepean sandstone encompassing the Campbell Quarry, Henry Bishop - Tillson quarry, Keefer quarry, from [2] the March (Theresa) Formation dolomitic rocks encompassing the GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Site, and  stop 5 for Donaldson and Chiarenzelli’s field trip.
   

Principal Reference Section and Type Sections 

Alice E. Wilson (1946) did not describe a type section for the Nepean Formation. She stated “The formation is named from Nepean township, where the large quarries lie from which the stone was taken for the Parliament Building of Canada, and for many other large government and other buildings.” On the north side of the Queensway, east of March  Road and west of Moodie Drive, is an outcrop of Nepean Formation sandstone that has been proposed as the Principal Reference Section for the Nepean Formation and as the Type Section for the Nepean Formation.  The outcrop was selected because it is close  of where the large quarries were located, is one of the thickest in the area, and because it was believed (incorrectly) that all of the quarries had been filled in.  Five close, but slightly different, sections of the outcrop have been measured, with the authors noting slightly different features.   One measured section was proposed as the Principal Reference Section for the Nepean Formation by Greggs and Bond  (1972 ).   Two other measured sections from this outcrop were proposed as the Type Section for the Nepean Formation by  Brand and Rust (1977a) and by Dix, Salad Hersi and  Nowlan  (2004).   The fourth is included in a doctoral thesis: Lowe (2016).  The fifth section was measured by Williams (1991, page 251)

Greggs and Bond  (1972 ) proposed a principal reference section for the Nepean  Formation that is on the north side of the Queensway (then Highway 17; now Highway 417) “1.1 mi (1.74 km) east of the junction of the Queensway (Highway 17) and the boundary road between Nepean and March Townships” [namely, Eagleson Road/March Road].   They also stated that the “This section lies between the Queensway (Highway 17) and the Corkstown road in the northeast  corner of Lot 5, Concession II, Nepean Township.”   They noted that “The section is not ideal in that  the upper contact with the March Formation has been eroded, but less than 3 mi (0.8 km) to the south along the same ridge, outcrops of the March Formation are present.”   They provided a measured section of eight sandstone units totaling 23.8 ft (6.85 m), with each unit being between 0.5 ft (0.2 m) and 6.8 ft (1.8 m) thick.  They placed all eight units within the Nepean formation.

While Greggs and Bond (1972) said that the quarry is on the “northeast corner” of Lot 5, the map
that was published as Greggs and Bond (1973) shows the quarry on the northwest corner of Lot 5.  The standard lot in Ontario was 20 chains (1,320 feet; a 1/4 mile) wide.  Their distance of 1.1 miles east of March Road places the measured section in the northwest corner of Lot 5.

Brand and Rust (1977a) measured a section  close to that measured by Greggs and Bond .   Brand and Rust (1977a) stated that “we located our section as close as possible to that of Greggs and Bond (1972, Fig. 1; 1973, p. 329).  It is on the north side of the Queensway, 2.2 km (1.35 miles) west of the Moodie Drive intersection (Fig. 1).  In passing, it should be noted that the Queensway exposures show lateral variations from the type section; notably the presence of channels in the lower Nepean units on the south side of the highway opposite the type section, and elsewhere.”  They proposed their section as the type section for the Nepean formation.   They described eight  Nepean sandstone units and an overlying ninth unit which they assigned to the  March formation,  in a measured section about 6.8 meters (calculated using their scale bar) thick.

Greggs  and Bond (1977) commented on Brand and Rust’s (1977) paper noting the “extreme difficulty experienced in distinguishing between Nepean and March” and that “Even Wilson's definition of the base of the March Formation, advocated by Brand and Rust, as the lowest sandstone with a consistent carbonate content cannot be applied to small, isolated exposures of Nepean-March sandstones; one can never be sure that one has found the lowest bed with a carbonate content,”   ... [T]he definition proposed by Wilson, and advocated by Brand and Rust for locating the base of the March Formation, is not feasible in practice.”
       
Brand  and Rust (1977b), in a reply to Greggs and Bond’s (1977) paper , noted that “In our paper we assumed that Greggs and Bond (1972) included the uppermost bed in their principal reference section, hence the apparent disagreement. They placed all their section in the Nepean Formation, whereas we recognized the uppermost bed as the base of the March.  However, Greggs informed us that their reference section was measured at a part of the roadcut where the uppermost bed is absent.”

Williams (1991, page 251) described a 6.7 meter measured section for the Queensway roadcut.  He describes five beds of Nepean Formation quartz sandstone overlain by a bed of March Formation sandy dolomite.  This is his section “OT-3: roadcut, Nepean (Queensway)” with UTM 432450E, 5019700N.   

Williams (1991, page 249) also measured a 1.75 m section of Nepean Formation sandstone on Corkstown Road.  This is his Section AO OT-7 .   He described the outcrop as “Quartz sandstone - white, white to reddish  brown weathering; fine to medium grained; thinly to massive bedded; ripple marks, non-calcareous.”    Williams placed the outcrop on Nepean Township, Lot 6, Concession l, Nepean Township.     There are additional roadside outcrops of Nepean sandstone 500 hundred meters further west along Corkstown Road.

Dix, Salad Hersi, and  Nowlan  (2004) measured a vertical section on the north side of the Queensway (but not  the same section as Greggs and Bond (1972) or Brand and Rust (1977a)) and a section on the south side, identifying the top beds of each section as the Theresa formation.   They proposed that the boundary between the Theresa and Nepean “should be repositioned
downsection by 1.5 m [from Brand and Rust’s boundary]  ... coincident with a disconformity.”

David Lowe (2016) includes  photographs  (Figure 5.27) of the  Keeseville-Theresa contact from the western Ottawa Embayment, including one from the outcrop along the Queensway.   His photograph ‘D’ is described as “Cryptic paraconformity between sabkha facies of the upper Keeseville (below) and locally bioturbated tide-dominated marine strata of Theresa Formation (above) at the type locality of the “Nepean Formation” along Highway 417 in Ottawa (locality 222). The base of the Theresa is defined by the lowest dolomite-cemented bed, following Dix et al. (2004). Slight preferential weathering of the uppermost ~20 cm of the Keeseville is attributed to an interstitial illuvial matrix that inhibited the silica or dolomite cementation present in adjacent strata.”    Dave also includes a measured section (Figure 5.28) which he describes as a “Stratigraphic log of the “Nepean Formation” (here abandoned) type section along highway 417 in Ottawa (locality 222). Red dashed line marks the paraconformity between the Keeseville and Theresa formations.”  Dave recommended abandoning the term ‘Nepean Formation’ and using ‘Keeseville Formation.’

Searching  45.32923,-75.86422 in Google Maps, switching to Google Satellite View, then Street View, and looking north, will show the outcrop.   Below is a photograph of the outcrop taken by Google Street View.   


I’ve driven by that outcrop at about 100 to 120 km per hour over 1,000 times in the last 15 years.  While drive-by mapping has known disadvantages, on a few occasions I’ve felt that I can identify the overlying bed of March (Theresa) formation dolostone identified by  Brand and Rust (1977a) and Williams (1991).   As Highway 417 is a restricted access highway, stopping to look at the outcrop is prohibited.

Bernius and Crow et al. Logged the Core from the GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Site


A point worth noting is that Bernius (1981, 1996) logged the drill core from the  GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Site.  The drill holes intersected about 65 m of Paleozoic rocks that dip at a low angle and thicken slightly to the north-northwest, underlain by Precambrian igneous and metamorphic rocks.   The core revealed (progressing down the holes):

Paleozoic
- 11 to 16 metres of Oxford Formation grey to reddish brown, sandy dolomite;
- 4 metres of March Formation comprised of a massive quartz arenite on the top and a light-grey coloured dolomitic sandstone at the bottom
- Nepean Formation comprised of (still progressing down the holes):
    - 16 metres of pure, well sorted, massive, white sandstone
   -  a 50 cm layer of reddish-brown shale

   -  27 metres comprised of a sequence of cross-bedded sandstones with fifteen bioturbate layers that range in thickness from 2 cm to 10 cm and alternate with the cross-bedding, with zones of vertical worms holes of the species skolithos, Diplocraterion and Arenicolites
   - a thin 5 cm layer of quartz-feldspar orthoconglomerate
Precambrian
- a 15 - 17 metre highly altered/weathered zone, a saprolite layer, in the Precambrian rocks
- syenites, granites and gneisses
   
Bernius was the only one to report Oxford Formation rocks directly south of CANMET’s Research Facility.   The 50 cm layer of reddish-brown shale within the Nepean Formation is also interesting, as is his report of 43 meters of Nepean Formation sandstone, which is much thicker than other estimates for this area and much thicker than the measured sections on the Queensway.
                       
In a recent paper Crow et al. (2021) provided new geophysical data from the drill holes at the GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Site.  They also re-logged the drill core.  Their description of the rocks differs slightly from Benius’ description. For example, they have adopted  more current names for the formations, don’t mention the layer of reddish brown shale, and assign more rock to the Theresa (formerly the March) Formation, and  less rock to the Beauharnois (formerly lower Oxford) Formation.  This is their description of the Paleozoic rocks:

“Keeseville (Nepean) Formation (core depths 20.45 – 64.30m)
The contact with the basement occurs at a 20cm thick quartz conglomerate with some brownish limonitic layers (Bernius, 1996). A 5.2m-long interval of white quartz sandstone overlies the conglomerate. Overlying this is a sandstone sequence characterized by alternating bioturbated and cross-bedded sandstone, both with variable amounts of hematite (visible iron staining), glauconite and limonite. There are 23 bioturbated layers identified, ranging in thickness from 5 to 83cm. Burrows are frequently seen in this interval. The upper 16m of the Keeseville Formation is characterized by massive, white quartz arenite with some dark laminae and irregular layers.

Theresa and Beauharnois Formations (core depths 5.30 (top of core) – 20.45m)
The Theresa Formation is composed of interbedded sandy calcareous dolostone and calcareous
sandstone. The base of the formation contains a distinct dark grey layer of uranium-bearing and
chalcopyrite-rich pyrobitumen (Charbonneau et al., 1975; Bernius, 1996) also known as thucolite (see Hoekstra and Fuchs, 1960). The core transitions upward into a grey, fine to medium crystalline dolostone, containing a few very thin interbeds of fine grained quartz sandstone.  Calcite-filled cavities are observed in core. The upper several metres of core are broken and fractured, with visible weathering along vertical fracture surfaces. The transitional nature of the Theresa Formation upward into the Beauharnois Formation leaves assigning the contact between the two open for re-examination. The local thickness of the Theresa Formation has been interpreted to be about 10m, suggesting that the upper few metres of core could be Beauharnois Fm.”

A 120 Foot Deep Test Shaft on Lot 5, Concession II, Nepean Township


What I have not been able to locate and mark on the map is the location of a 120 foot deep test shaft dug on Lot 5, Concession II, Nepean Township.  It could be anywhere between Corkstown Road and Robertson Road,  would be west of the Henry Bishop - Tillson quarry and well east or southeast of the Campbell Quarry.  Presumably the shaft is covered.

Hewitt (1963, pages 23, 25) mentions that “In 1949 and 1950 work was carried out in the Bells Corners area under the direction of F. W. Huggins of Ottawa with a view to developing a deposit of Nepean sandstone as a source of glass sand. The average of chemical analyses of twenty-four core samples obtained in a diamond-drill program, is given as follows :  SiO2....97.3%; Al2O3. ... 0.76%, Fe2O3.... 0.116%, L. O. I.... 0.54% .  The drilling program is reported to have outlined some 7,000,000 tons of sandstone of the above composition in a 10-foot bed at a depth of 110 feet. 
    In December 1950, a test shaft 5 by 8 feet was sunk to a depth of 120 feet on lot 5, concession
II, Nepean township, to test the pure sandstone beds near the base of the Nepean Formation. A
bulk sample of 100 tons taken at the shaft area had the following analysis:  SiO2 .... 97.65%,   A12O3...0.74%,   Fe2O3...0.195%,  L. O. I. ..... 0.53%.
    A 250-ton sample of sandstone, obtained from a 30-foot room 170 feet from the shaft, was shipped to Ottawa ...   70-80 percent of the sample was recovered as glass sand of satisfactory physical requirements for the glass  industry.   It was considered that the added costs of underground mining would make the project uneconomic.”


What is interesting about Hewitt’s report is that the Nepean sandstone on lot 5 extends to a depth of 110 feet.    I suspect that this is much deeper than anyone looking at Greggs and Bond  (1972),  Brand and Rust (1977a) or  Dix, Salad Hersi and  Nowlan  (2004)  would have predicted.  However, if the shaft was dug south of the fault and east or southeast of the GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Site then Hewitt’s report of  10-foot bed at a depth of 110 feet could correspond with  Bernius’ (1981, 1996) report of 16 metres of pure, well sorted, massive, white sandstone extending from 20 metres  to 36 metres [66 feet to 120 feet].     Collings and Andrews (1989, page 116) summarize a report by Huggins (1950) stating “The sandstone bed was reported to be 3 m thick, to contain 7 Mt and to be overlaid by calcareous sandstone.”  Being overlain by calcareous sandstone (likely the March/Theresa Formation) places the location either close to Corkstown Road or south of the fault.

Egner’s  (1994) and Owen's (1962, 63) Reports on Drill Core from Bells Corners


There is additional drill core from this area. Egner (1994) reported that he had logged drill core from Bells Corners at the Geological Survey of Canada Core Library located at Tunney’s Pasture and Hull.  His log is at pages 164 -168 of his thesis and his section is at pages 188- 189.   He reported 25 feet of March dolomite and sandstone overlying 81 feet of Nepean sandstone.  I have not contacted the GSC Core Library to try to get the co-ordinates of the drill hole. 
 

Owen (1962, 1963) reports that Canada’s Mines Branch drilled seven test boreholes in the Nepean sandstone on lot  5, concession 1 (O. F.)  Nepean township, about a kilometer north of Corkstown Road. The holes were drilled to find a suitable location for an experimental mine to conduct experiments relating to rock mechanics.   Logs of the drill core record up to 101 feet of sandstone underlain by discontinuous beds of silty shale and conglomerate up to 5 feet in thickness, overlying  granite.  Two of the holes were drilled in a small abandoned quarry, that would have been part of Howard Rock’s quarry, one face of which is shown below.


Areas of Natural or Scientific Interest (ANSI) and Constructing the  LRT


Morrison Hershfield (2017) in a report on the Moodie Light Rail Transit  Extension for the City of Ottawa, mention that both (A) the Queensway Road Cut area which was proposed as a reference section for the Nepean (Potsdam) Formation, and (B) Campbell's Quarry have been designated by Ontario as Areas of Natural or Scientific Interest (ANSI) –Earth Sciences.    Management and stewardship of an ANSI is a municipal responsibility.   Any development plans must "demonstrate that no negative impacts on the natural features or their ecological functions will occur".  
   
As part of the the LRT extension to Kanata a Light Maintenance and Storage Facility (LMSF) is being built west of Moodie Drive between Corkstown Road and the Queensway.    From 2025 to 2031 the extension of the LRT to Kanata is slated for construction  from Moodie Drive to Eagleson Road/March Road and on through Kanata to Hazeldean Road.   Between Moodie and Eagleson/March the  LRT will run parallel with and along the north side of Highway 417 (See Manconi, 2018 , pages 20-22).    In other parts of Ottawa where the LRT has been constructed (for example, close to the University of Ottawa), the dual tracks and track bed are about 10 meters wide.    If the scale for Google Maps is accurate, then there are about 11 meters between the edge of the northern shoulder for the Queensway  and the front of the tall outcrops that face the Queensway.   The LRT will be constructed above the lower outcrops and could easily require blasting of the outcrops that are Greggs and Bond's  (1972 )  principal reference section for the Nepean  Formation.   Ominously, the map at page 20 of Manconi's (2018) report suggests construction will take out most of the outcrop.
 
Christopher Brett
Ottawa


References and Suggested Reading


Beer, H.L., 1950
"Flotation of alumina, from Bells Corners silica"; Ore Dress Inv Rep. (unnumbered); CANMET, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, 1950. [referenced in Collings and Andrews, 1989]

Bernius, G. R., 1981,
Boreholes Near Ottawa for the Development and Testing of Borehole Logging Equipment - A preliminary Report GSC Paper 81-1C, p. 51-53
https://ftp.maps.canada.ca/pub/nrcan_rncan/publications/STPublications_PublicationsST/116/116175/pa_81_1c.pdf
  
Bernius, G. R., 1996,
Borehole Geophysical Logs from the GSC Borehole Geophysics test site at Bell’s Corners, Nepean, Ontario, GSC Open File 3157, 38 pages, doi:10.4095/207617
   
Brand, U., and Rust, B.R.,  1977a
The age and upper boundary of the Nepean formation in its type section area near Ottawa, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14: 2002–2006.
www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/e77-171 #.WR-TQbiN0r0

Brand, U., and Rust, B.R., 1977b
 The age and upper boundary of the Nepean formation in its type section area near Ottawa, Ontario: Reply. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14: 2671–2673.   10.1139/e77-233

Brett, Christopher, 2017
Why has hardly anyone referred to core from the GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Area at Bell’s Corners, Ottawa, when the core contains a 50 cm thick shale layer in the Nepean Formation and the core straddles the boundary between the Nepean Formation and the overlying March Formation?   Blog Posting, Monday, 22 May 2017
http://fossilslanark.blogspot.com/2017/05/why-has-hardly-anyone-referred-to-core.html

Collings,  R.K. and P.R.A. Andrews, 1989
Summary Report No. 4: Silica.  Mineral Processing Laboratory, CANMET Mineral Sciences Laboratory, 135 pages https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2018/rncan-nrcan/m38-13/M38-13-89-1-eng.pdf
   
Crow, H L; Brewer, K D; Cartwright, T J; Gaines, S; Heagle, D; Pugin, A J -M; Russell, H A J
2021    New core and downhole geophysical data sets from the Bells Corners Borehole Calibration Facility Ottawa, Ontario.  Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 8811, 2021, 36 pages, https://doi.org/10.4095/328837          Released:   2021 09 14

Dix, George R.,  Salad Hersi, Osman, and  Nowlan, Godfrey S.,  2004
The Potsdam-Beekmantown Group boundary, Nepean Formation type section (Ottawa, Ontario): a cryptic sequence boundary, not a conformable transition, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2004, 41(8): 897-902,  http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/e04-040

Egner, M.C., 1994
Weathering Characteristics of Building Stone at Ottawa, Canada.   Carleton University, Thesis, Master of Science.  209 pages
https://doi.org/10.22215/etd/1994-02814
https://curve.carleton.ca/system/files/etd/0c68f4a1-b270-491b-a49c-434a7a865ff6/etd_pdf/e4a03c2b65def31470d3d23e7b9fa119/egner-weatheringcharacteristicsofbuildingstoneat_col.pdf
    

Fejer, P.J., 1986
Correlation and Depositional Environments of an Ordovician Succession  in the Bell's Corners Area near Ottawa, Unpub.  B.Sc. Thesis, University of Ottawa, May 1,  1986.
(Not available. Cited by Bernius (1996), but not listed in Carleton University Library catalogue https://library.carleton.ca/)


Greggs, R. G.  and Bond, I. J., 1972
A principal reference section proposed for the Nepean  Formation of probable Tremadocian age near Ottawa, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 9, pp. 933-941.         www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/e72-078

Greggs, R. G.  and Bond, I. J., 1973.
Erratum: A principal reference section proposed for the Nepean Formation of probable Tremadocian age near Ottawa, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 10, p. 329

Greggs, R. G.  and Bond, I. J., 1977
The age and upper boundary of the Nepean formation in its type section area near Ottawa, Ontario: Discussion. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14: 2669–2671. 10.1139/e77-232

Hewitt, D.F., 1951[?]
Silica in Ontario. Industrial Mineral Circular No. 2 - Ontario. Department of Mines, 17 pages

Hewitt, D.F., 1963
Silica in Ontario. Industrial Mineral Report No. 9. Ontario. Department of Mines, 36 pages
http://ccob.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/silica-in-ontario.pdf

Hewitt, D.F., 1964
Building Stones of Ontario. Part IV Sandstone. Industrial Mineral Report No. 17.  Ontario. Department of Mines, 57 pages

Huggins, F.W., 1950
Testwork on Bells Corners Sandstone.   Report (unnumbered), 1950.
[cited as  Ont. — 37 (Ref. No. 133) at page 116 in Collings  and Andrews, 1989]
   
Lowe, David G., 2016
Sedimentology, Stratigraphic Evolution and Provenance of the Cambrian – Lower Ordovician Potsdam Group in the Ottawa Embayment and Quebec Basin.  Doctoral Thesis.  University of Ottawa.  435 pages   https://ruor.uottawa.ca/handle/10393/35303

MacPherson, A.R., 1951
"Report on Bells Corners sandstone for production of glass sand"; Ore Dress Inv Rep 4; CANMET, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, 1951  [referenced in Collings and Andrews, 1989]

Manconi, John, 2018
Kanata Light Rail Transit Planning and Environmental Assessment  Study (Moodie  Drive to  Hazeldean  Road
http://ottwatch.ca/meetings/file/519019

Morrison Hershfield, Engineers, 2017
 Moodie  Light Rail Transit  Extension. 
https://documents.ottawa.ca/sites/documents/files/Bayshore%20to%20Moodie%20BRT%20Conversion%20to%20LRT%20Environmental%20Project%20Report.pdf
    

Owen, E. B., 1962
Proposed site for an experimental mine, Bells Corners area, Carleton County, Ontario
Owen, E B; Geological Survey of Canada, Topical Report 57, 1962, 42 pages (2 sheets), https://doi.org/10.4095/289967

Owen, E. B., 1963
Experimental Mine, in Summary of Activities: Office and Laboratory, 1962; Geological Survey of Canada, Paper no. 63-2, 1963 p. 73,


Powell, R.D. and M.A. Klugman, 1979
Silica Sand Potential in Eastern Ontario Preliminary Report I, p. I-22, Ontario Geological Survey,  OFR5265 [1-E   North Elmsley; OC-A   March, p. 175] http://www.geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/pub/data/records/OFR5265.html

Sanford , B. V. And Arnott, R.W.C., 2010
Stratigraphic and structural framework of the Potsdam Group in eastern Ontario, western Quebec, and northern New York State. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 597, 83 pages

Vos, M.A., 1978
Silica in Ontario, Supplement; Ontario Geological Survey, Open File Report 5236, 50 p., 23 figures, 3 tables.  http://www.geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/pub/data/imaging/OFR5236/OFR5236.pdf

Williams,  D.A., 1991
Paleozoic  Geology  of  the  Ottawa-St.  Lawrence  Lowland,  Southern  Ontario;  Ontario  Geological  Survey,  Open  File  Report  5770,  292p   

Williams, D. A., Rae, A. M. And Wolf, R.R., 1982
Paleozoic Geology of the Ottawa Area, Southern Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey, Map P. 2716, Geological Series, Preliminary Map, scale 1:50,000, Geology by D. A Williams, A. M. Rae,  And R.R. Wolf, 1982
    

Wilson, Alice E. 1946
 Geology  of  the  Ottawa - St. Lawrence Lowland, Ontario and Quebec.  Geological  Survey  of
Canada, Memoir  241. 65 pages


Wilson, Alice E.,  1956
 A Guide to the Geology of the Ottawa District, Volume 70, 1,  The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 73 pages, including five plates, and 1 map sheet. Campbell Quarry at page 23.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/90128#page/33/mode/1up
 



Thursday, 21 October 2021

Abandoned Nepean Sandstone Quarries and Outcrops in the Greenspace West of Bells Corners

The National Capital Commission (‘NCC’) maintains a series of walking and biking trails through the Greenspace in Ottawa, and provides a number of parking lots to access the trails. On its web site the NCC has maps showing the trails and the parking lots. There is no charge to park in the lots. Links to the maps are provided below.

  In my November 4, 2015 blog posting (Brett, 2015b) I provided directions to, and photographs of, an outcrop showing convoluted biofilms and stromatolites in the Nepean Formation sandstone in the Greenspace at Kanata. That outcrop is just east of Eagleson Road and south of Robertson Road. It is part of the Old Quarry Trail. Parking at lot P5 off Eagleson provides easy access to that outcrop (and to an abandoned Nepean sandstone quarry). 

 This posting describes outcrops and abandoned quarries of Nepean sandstone in the NCC Greenbelt about three kilometers to the northwest of the convoluted outcrop on the Old Quarry Trail and briefly discusses their historical significance. Historically the outcrops and quarries were referred to as being west of Bells Corners, because Kanata was not in existence when the quarries were being operated. The quarries are north and south of the Queensway/Highway 417, east of Eagleson Road, west of Moodie Drive, and north of Timm Road, where the easiest access is from parking lot P3 on Corkstown Road. 

The outcrops described below are south of the outcrops along Highway 417 that were designated in the 1970's and 1980's as the principal reference section for the Nepean Formation, and which are inaccessible to the public because it is illegal to stop a car on a 400 series highway unless it is an emergency, and because six foot high fences prevent one accessing the outcrops by land. The papers discussing the proposed reference section are listed in my May 22, 2017 blog posting, which discusses drill core from Natural Resources Canada’s Borehole Geophysics Test Area. The Borehole Geophysics Test Area is a kilometer south of the outcrops accessed from parking lot P3 on Corkstown Road. 

Directions:   Exit the Queensway/Highway 417 heading north on Moodie Drive. Take the first left onto Corkstown Road. Drive about 2 kilometers south then west along Corkstown Road. One hundred meters after crossing the railroad tracks, park in Lot P3 on your right. Exit your car and walk east along Corkstown for about 100 meters, crossing the railroad tracks. Cross Corkstown and take the Trans Canada Trail (Greenbelt Pathway West) under the Queensway. Follow the trail for about 25 minutes until you pass under the high voltage Hydro Lines. Take the narrow path on the west side of the hydro lines and walk north about 60 meters to the outcrops. Plugging 45.33271, -75.85855 into Google Maps will show the location of parking lot P3 on Corkstown Road. 

The following extract from the NCC’s All Seasons Trail Map shows the location of the major roads, parking lot P3 and the Trans Canada Trail (dashed red and white). The location of the outcrops of interest is shown by the red square. The easement for the high voltage hydro lines is shown by parallel blue lines. Where the trail passes under the hydro lines the trail is shaded blue. Additional trail 20 is shown in brown, and while it does cross the outcrops of interest, the start of trail 20 was flooded on the two times that I tried to access the trail. The black box enclosing the letter ‘C’ is the approximate location of the Campbell quarry. The letter ‘Q’ in a red box represents one part of the Tillson quarry. The magenta box encompasses the outcrops of Nepean sandstone along Highway 417, which various authors tried to designate as the principal reference section for the Nepean formation. The green square shows the location of the GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Site. The black square gives the approximate location of an outcrop of March formation dolostone and dolomitic quartz arenite along Timm Road which is stop 5 for Donaldson and Chiarenzelli’s (2004) field trip.


 


 Plugging 45.325504,-75.860545 into Google Maps in SatelliteView will show the  outcrops along the hydro easement.   The following extract shows what can be seen in Satellite View. 



 The light green diagonal swath is the easement for the high voltage hydro lines.  I have shown the location of the Trans Canada Trail/Greenbelt Pathway West with red dots.  The two white boxes with the included letter ‘T’ are below  two hydro towers.   The outcrops of most interest are along the hydro easement between the hydro towers and the Trans Canada Trail. The outcrops appear white and gray in satellite view.  Glacial striae and chatter marks, which indicate the direction the glacier was moving are visible on the surface of glacially polished outcrops.  The white box with the letter G shows the location of additional glacially polished flat outcrops.
                       
The following two photographs show glacial striae and chatter marks at this location.

The following photograph shows ripple marks visible at this location.


The following two  photographs show a distorted microbial mat texture, an example of soft sediment deformation likely caused by an earthquake.  This feature can be found directly under the southern hydro lines about 25 meters southeast of the lower hydro tower shown in satellite view. 




The following photo shows a pitted surface.  The holes are thought to be evaporite  minerals that  weathered out. 

Donaldson and Chiarenzelli’s Outcrop

On the map I have indicated with a black square  the approximate location of an outcrop of March formation dolostone and dolomitic quartz arenite  which is stop 5 for Donaldson and Chiarenzelli’s (2004) field trip.  This is their description of the outcrop:

“This section is only a few metres above the top of the Nepean formation. The carbonate beds contain abundant burrows, including several varieties that are bedding-parallel. Despite the extensive bioturbation, wispy biofilm structures and a few possible dewatering structures can be seen at several stratigraphic levels. Both the siliciclastic and carbonate beds display abundant crossbedding, and carbonate intraclasts are evident in some of the siliclastic beds.”
                                           

Nepean Sandstone Quarries


In her memoir, Alice E. Wilson (1946) did not describe a type section for the Nepean Formation. She stated “The formation is named from Nepean township, where the large quarries lie from which the stone was taken for the Parliament Building of Canada, and for many other large government and other buildings (See Plate I).”  Most of the quarries (now abandoned) lay on Lots  4, 5 and 6 of Concession I, Ottawa Front, Nepean township, and Lots 3, 4 and  6 of Concession II of Ottawa Front, Nepean township (see Parks, 1912, pages 133-137; and Cole, 1923, page 47), all north west of Bells Corners.    Corkstown Road is the dividing line between Concession 1 and Concession 2.    Concession 1 is north of Corkstown Road while Concession II is south of Corkstown Road.  

One of the most important Nepean sandstone quarries was operated  on Lot 6, Concession II.   In the late 1800's the quarry on Lot  6, Concession II, Ottawa Front  was called the Bishop’s Quarry and was owned and operated by Henry Bishop of Bell's  Corners.  Logan and Hunt (1862) and the Geological Corps of Canada  (1876) comment that “The fine quarry from which this sandstone was obtained is on the property of  Mr.  H.  Bishop,  and from it the largest part of the stone used in the construction of the Parliament buildings at Ottawa was derived.”  It was called Bishop’s Quarry as late as 1904  (see  Hoffman, 1906).   By 1912 the quarry was owned by T. W. Tillson of Bells Corners (see Parks, 1912).  Cole (1923) also states that the quarry on Lot  6, con. II, Ottawa Front was owned by T. W. Tillson, Bells Corners.  Parks (1912) reports that sandstone from the Tillson quarry was used in the construction of the Victoria Memorial Museum (now the Museum of Nature), the Mint, the Observatory  at the Experimental Farm, and the addition to the Court House in Ottawa. 

I marked the location of an abandoned sandstone quarry at the junction of path 20 and the Trans Canada Trail with a letter ‘Q’ in a red box.  One will also notice that sandstone blocks are strewn on either side of the Trans Canada Trail from the junction of path 20  to the  outcrops of interest, and that it looks like sandstone was quarried from part of the outcrops of interest.   Both the abandoned quarry marked with the ‘Q’ and the outcrops of interest fall on Lot 6, Concession II,  and are parts of the quarry operated by  Henry Bishop and T. W. Tillson.  Parks (1912) devotes a little over two pages to a description of the quarry and the different stones taken from the quarry (one a white stone with a calcareous cement; another a white stone with a slight cast of green, with silica as the cement; the third in yellow and brown bands), noting that about 20 acres of stone were exposed on the property,  that the sequence of beds is different in different places on the property, and that stone was quarried from various openings at different levels .  

Andrew King’s  (2017) blog posting has excellent photos of sandstone blocks at the Bishop/ Tillson Quarry (which he misidentified as the Campbell Quarry).  One of Andrew King’s photos shows a six to ten inch convoluted layer at the top of an outcrop, likely representing distorted microbial mats.  One couldn’t take a better picture showing soft sediment deformation.   (I’ll have to go back and look for the outcrop.)   His photos appear to have been taken around the northern junction of path 20 with the Trans Canada Trail, the location I marked with a letter ‘Q’ in a red box. [On Sunday, October 24th I  visited the abandoned Bishop’s Quarry/ Tillson Quarry  looking for the outcrop in Andrew King's photo.  I didn't find it.  The main quarry area is quite extensive, covering about 140 meters by 80 meters.   Discarded stone blocks cover an even greater area.  There are a number of benches in the quarry but all are quite shallow (2 to 4 feet).  The quarry does not drain well and many parts were covered in up to 2 inches of water and mud.  I handicapped myself  by not wearing rubber boots.]  Andrew King will be familiar to those in Ottawa as an artist whose paintings  challenge the observers' perceptions of reality, much like Magritte’s paintings.

The Campbell Quarry, another famous Nepean Sandstone quarry, falls on Lot 3, Concession II and can be found three lots to the west of the Tillson quarry.   Nepean Sandstone is  the prime building material for Canada’s  Parliament Buildings.  When a February 1916 fire destroyed the Centre Block and Victoria Tower , the Campbell Quarry, “supplied much of the stone for the Centre Block and all of the stone for the Peace Tower [Lawrence, 2001]” when the Center Block and Peace Tower were rebuilt.  Regrettably, the Campbell Quarry is on the premises of Natural Resources Canada’s CANMET research complex and is not accessible to the public.  Baird’s (1968) field trip guide to the Ottawa area contains a photograph of workmen “removing flagstone and  building stone from the Nepean sandstone outcrops at the old Campbell's quarry, west of Bells Corners.”  That photograph is reproduced below.


Sanford and Arnott (2006) describe the quarry as two benches with an estimated 11 vertical meters of strata.  They  include a photograph of the lower bench of  Campbell’s quarry as Figure 64 at page 65 of their bulletin.  The quarry is their station O-3.   I’ve plotted the location of the Campbell Quarry on my  above  map with a black box enclosing the letter C  based on Bernius' (1981, page 52)  map showing the location of the quarry.  ( See also   the  June 29, 2017 comment by nepeanninthenders on King’s, 2017 blog.).  

The Campbell quarry had been called the Morrison Quarry before Archie Campbell joined.  While the Campbell quarry is credited by Lawrence as supplying  much of the stone for the rebuilt Centre Block and Peace Tower, Cole (1923) notes that “The Nepean Sandstone Quarries, Ltd., for several years operated [Howard]  Rock's quarry [on Lot 5, concession  I, Ottawa Front]  and produced stone for use in the new parliament building at Ottawa. Several of the other quarries furnished stone for the same purpose.”  Cole noted that at Rock’s quarry  “Three types of stone can be recognized, a white, friable variety, a hard, white, consolidated kind, and a brown and yellow variety.”

It is somewhat ironic that Alice E. Wilson (1946) did not describe a type section for the Nepean Formation (and has been criticized for failing to do so), that Greggs and Bond (1972)  designated the outcrops along Highway  17  as the principal reference section for the Nepean Formation, that the highway became a limited access highway 417 where it is not permissible to stop unless there is an emergency,   yet David Lowe in his doctoral thesis and in  Lowe et al. ( 2017) has shown that the Nepean  (Keeseville) formation is quite variable being comprised of fluvial, eolian, marginal marine, and shallow marine facies.  Alice E. Wilson was right not to describe a type section.

Christopher Brett
Ottawa, Ontario   

   

National Capital Commission Resources

   
Hiking and Walking in the Greenbelt
https://ncc-ccn.gc.ca/places/hiking-and-walking-greenbelt

All Seasons Trail Map 2020-2022
https://ncc-website-2.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/national-capital-greenbelt-all-seasons-trail-map.pdf?mtime=20200729102617&focal=none
   

References and Suggested Reading

   
Agnon, Amotz; Claudia Migowski and Shmuel Marco,  2006
Intraclast breccias in laminated sequences reviewed: Recorders of paleo-earthquakes
Geological Society of America, Special Paper 401
http://indico.ictp.it/event/a08182/session/61/contribution/39/material/0/0.pdf

Baird. D.M., 1968.

 Guide to the Geology and Scenery of the National Capital Region. Copyright Geological Survey of Canada. Misc. Report 15, 188  pages  https://doi.org/10.4095/119888

Bernius, G. R., 1981,
Boreholes Near Ottawa for the Development and Testing of Borehole Logging Equipment - A preliminary Report GSC Paper 81-1C, p. 51-53
https://ftp.maps.canada.ca/pub/nrcan_rncan/publications/STPublications_PublicationsST/116/116175/pa_81_1c.pdf
   
Bernius, G. R., 1996,
Borehole Geophysical Logs from the GSC Borehole Geophysics test site at Bell’s Corners, Nepean, Ontario, GSC Open File 3157, 38 pages, doi:10.4095/207617
(pdf  6427 KB)

Brett, Christopher, 2015a
Soft-Sediment Deformation (Seismites) in Nepean Sandstone Close to the Rideau Lake Fault. Blog posting, Thursday, 22 October 2015
http://fossilslanark.blogspot.com/2015/10/soft-sediment-deformation-seismites-in.html

Brett, Christopher, 2015b
In 1924 a report of Stromatolites in Nepean Sandstone by Dr. Morley E. Wilson of the Geological Survey of Canada, and Other Reports of Stromatolites and Biofilms in the Potsdam
Outcrops of Biofilms and Stromatolites in the Nepean Formation Sandstone at Kanata.. Blog posting, Wednesday, 4 November 2015   
http://fossilslanark.blogspot.com/2015/11/in-1924-report-of-stromatolites-in.html

Brett, Christopher, 2015c       
Dewatering Structures, Biofilm Structures, Glacial Striae and Chatter Marks in Potsdam Sandstone near Newboro, Eastern Ontario.  Blog posting, Wednesday, 23 December 2015

Brett, Christopher, 2015d
More Evidence of Microbial Mats in Potsdam Sandstone near Newboro, Eastern Ontario.  Blog posting,  Tuesday, 29 December 2015
http://fossilslanark.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2016-01-26T09:11:00-08:00&max-results=7
   
Brett, Christopher, 2017
Why has hardly anyone referred to core from the GSC’s Borehole Geophysics Test Area at Bell’s Corners, Ottawa, when the core contains a 50 cm thick shale layer in the Nepean Formation and the core straddles the boundary between the Nepean Formation and the overlying March Formation?   Blog Posting, Monday, 22 May 2017
http://fossilslanark.blogspot.com/2017/05/why-has-hardly-anyone-referred-to-core.html

Cole, L. H., 1923
Silica in Canada. Its Occurrence, Exploitation, and Uses.  Part I -.Eastern Canada.  Canada Mines Branch, Publication 555, 1923, 135 pages (9 sheets), https://doi.org/10.4095/307756

Donaldson, J. Allan  and Chiarenzelli, Jeffrey R., 2004
Stromatolites and Associated Biogenic Structures in Cambrian and Ordovician Strata in and Near Ottawa, Ontario; 76th Annual Meeting, Field Trip Guidebook, New York State Geological Association, 283 pages, at pages 1-20   

Geological Corps of Canada, 1876
Descriptive catalogue of a collection of the economic minerals of Canada, and notes on a stratigraphical collection of rocks [Philadelphia International Exhibition, 1876]
Geological Corps of Canada; Geological Survey of Canada, Separate Report no. 405, 1876, 152 pages, https://doi.org/10.4095/216063

                               
Hewitt, D. F., 1964
Building Stones of Ontario, Part IV, Sandstone. Industrial Mineral Report No. 17, at pages 17-18
http://www.geologyontario.mndmf.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/pub/data/imaging/IMR017/IMR017.pdf

Hoffman, G.C., 1906
Chemistry and Mineralogy, pages 337A-349A, in Geological Survey of Canada , Annual Report for  1904 , Annual Report (New Series) Volume XVI, published in 1906


King, Andrew,  2017
The Deserted Stone Quarry Of Canada’s Parliament Buildings.  Blog posting June 2017
https://ottawarewind.com/2017/06/28/finding-the-forgotten-quarry-of-canadas-parliament-buildings/
   
Lawrence, D.E., 2001
Building Stones Of Canada’s Federal Parliament Buildings, GeoScience Canada, Volume 28, Number 1, 18 pages

Logan, W. E. and  Hunt, T. S., 1862
Descriptive catalogue of a collection of the economic minerals of Canada, and of its crystalline rocks sent to the London International Exhibition for 1862. Geological Survey of Canada, Separate Report no. 398, 1862, 89 pages, https://doi.org/10.4095/216057    


Lowe, David G., Arnott,R.W.C.,  Nowlan, Godfrey S.,  McCracken, A.D.,  2017
Lithostratigraphic and allostratigraphic framework of the Cambrian–Ordovician Potsdam Group and correlations across Early Paleozoic southern Laurentia; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, Published on the web 6 February 2017,    doi: 10.1139/cjes-2016-0151

McCormick Rankin Corporation, 2009
REPORT ON Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment  West Transitway Extension  Part Lots 8 - 11, Concession 1  Part Lots 8 - 16, Concession 2  Geographic Township of Nepean  Carleton County, Ontario PIF Number:  P311-007-2009 REPORT Report Number:  09-1121-0008 (5000)
https://app06.ottawa.ca/calendar/ottawa/citycouncil/occ/2010/09-08/tc/04d%20-%20Document%204%20Appendix%20C%20-%20Stage%201%20Archaeology%20Report.pdf
 

Parks, W. A., 1912
Report on the Building and Ornamental Stones of Canada, Volume 1. Canada, Department of Mines, Mines Branch. 376 pages At pages 133-135
    

Sanford , B. V. And Arnott, R.W.C., 2010
Stratigraphic and structural framework of the Potsdam Group in eastern Ontario, western Quebec, and northern New York State. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 597, 83 pages
   
Seccaspina, Linda, 2020
Tag Archives: campbell quarry           
https://lindaseccaspina.wordpress.com/tag/campbell-quarry

Wilson, Alice E., 1946
Geology of the Ottawa-St. Lawrence Lowland, Ontario and Quebec. Geological Survey of Canada.  Memoir 241

Wilson, Alice E.,  1956
 A Guide to the Geology of the Ottawa District, Volume 70, 1,  The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 73 pages, including five plates, and 1 map sheet. Campbell Quarry at page 23.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/90128#page/33/mode/1up
   
++++++++++++
Highway Traffic Act
R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 627: USE OF CONTROLLED-ACCESS HIGHWAYS BY PEDESTRIANS
 1. (1) Subject to subsection (2), pedestrians are prohibited from using those parts of the controlled-access highways described in Schedule 1.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to pedestrians,
(a) engaged in police, highway maintenance, highway construction or vehicle inspection duties;
(b) within commuter parking lots established and maintained by the Ministry or proceeding directly between such lots and adjacent intersecting highways;
(c) within truck inspection stations or pulp load check areas established and maintained by the Ministry;
(d) making use of a controlled-access highway where the use is necessary because of an emergency; or
(e) crossing at a traffic control signal or a crosswalk.


Sunday, 8 August 2021

Concentric Circular Structures and an Ovoid Burrow in Rocks Mapped as the Ordovician March (Theresa) Formation

 In various blog postings dated from 2014 to 2016 I included photographs of cylindrical dewatering structures in the Cambrian Potsdam sandstone of Eastern Ontario.

For my  October 22, 2019 blog  posting I provided photographs of a concentric, circular structure observed in slabs of rock at a quarry mapped as the Ordovician Gull River Formation by the Ontario Geological Survey.

Below are three photographs of circular structures in two slabs of dolostone in Lanark County, just west of Carleton Place, where the rock has been mapped as the March (Theresa) formation by Williams  and Wolf (1984) of the  Ontario Geological Survey.  The second photo is a close up of the first slab. The third photo is of a separate slab.

 



The blue ruler records inches and centimeters.

The  concentric structures are about four inches (14 cm) in diameter.     The structures appear to be stromatolites or oncolites, both microbial structures.  In their marginal notes to Map  P. 2725, Williams  and Wolf (1984) mention that “algal mats and stromatolites are common” in the March Formation.  An alternate interpretation is that these structures  represent concentric microbial discoid structures similar to microbial-related biogenic structures from the Middle Ordovician slates of northern Portugal reported by Neto de Carvalho et al.  (2016).
            

[added November 23, 2021:]  Giles (1976; pages 53-59) reported both oncolites  and stromatolites in Beekmantown dolostones in Eastern Ontario for  his Prescott formation, which would be roughly equivalent to Alice E. Wilson’s March Formation.  The oncolites were “spheroidal, commonly oblong or elongate in shape, and are visibly banded around intraclasts of dolostone, gastropod fragments or other fossil fragments.”  The maximum diameter he recorded at two localities was  2.6 inches (6.8 cm) and 4 inches (10 cm).

Ovoid Burrow

Below is a photograph of an ovoid, scooped out, structure in a loose slab of sandy dolomite from the same locality. The ovoid structure is about 10 centimeters long by 7 centimeters wide by 3 centimeters deep.   It appears to be trace fossil – possibly a  dwelling or feeding burrow with a narrow , 1 cm wide, entrance at  the upper right.

Below is an enlarged view of this structure.


Christopher Brett
Ottawa


References and Suggested Reading
   
Brett, Christopher, 2014-2016
January 29, 2014  - Cylindrical Structures in Potsdam Group Sandstone in Eastern Ontario
August 27, 2015 - Cylindrical Structures in Potsdam Group Sandstone in Eastern Ontario - Part 2
September 28,  2015 - A Map Showing the Location of Cylindrical and Conical Structures in Potsdam (Group) Sandstone of Ontario and New York
October 22, 2015  -  Cylindrical structures in Sandstone: A Type of Soft-Sediment Deformation Sometimes Linked to Seismic Activity
December 23,  2015 - Dewatering Structures, Biofilm Structures, Glacial Striae and Chatter Marks in Potsdam Sandstone near Newboro, Eastern Ontario
September 22,  2016 - Frothed Sandstone and Cylindrical Structures Found in Potsdam Sandstone
Fossilslanark.blogspot.ca

Brett, Christopher, 2019
A Concentric Circular Structure in Rocks of the Ottawa Embayment that are Mapped as the Ordovician Gull River Formation. Blog posting dated Tuesday, 22 October 2019
http://fossilslanark.blogspot.com/2019/10/a-concentric-circular-structure-in.html

Giles, P.  S. 1976.
Stratigraphy,  petrology,  and  diagenesis  of Beekmantown carbonate  rocks. Ph.D. thesis,  University of Western Ontario,  London,  Ontario
https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/digitizedtheses/904/


Neto de Carvalho, C. , Couto, H., Figueiredo, M. V., and A. Baucon, 2016
Microbial-related biogenic structures from the Middle Ordovician slates of Canelas (northern Portugal).  Comunicações Geológicas (2016) 103, Especial I, 23-38
https://www.researchgate.net/journal/Comunicacoes-Geologicas-0873-948X

Williams, D.A., and Wolf, R.R., 1984
Paleozoic Geology of the Carleton Place Area, Southern Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey, Map P. 2725, Geological Series-Preliminary Map, scale 1:50 000. Geology 1982.


Friday, 30 July 2021

What was Alice E. Wilson Thinking When She Renamed the Theresa Formation as the March Formation for the rocks of the Ottawa Embayment?

 
There are two ways of interpreting the title of this blog post.  I have adopted the kinder interpretation.  I am writing this posting to explain her reasoning and because I want to put on record a number of references that have been overlooked.  I am not asking the question “How could she have done that?”

Many that are familiar with the March/Theresa naming controversy will probably be surprised that I used the word ‘renamed’ in the title of this blog posting.  To understand why I used the word ‘renamed’ in the title, and to understand why the particular rock formation of interest was for fifty years called the March Formation in Ontario and more recently has been called the Theresa Formation in Ontario, it helps to know a bit of the history.  

Logan (1863) of the  Geological  Survey  of Canada  used the term “beds of passage” for the rock exposed in Ontario and Quebec that we now call March/Theresa Formation.   For example he referred to the “the beds of passage between the Potsdam and the succeeding formation,” the Calciferous.  Logan also reported finding the gastropod fossil Ophileta compacta in the passage beds.  Logan considered the beds of passage to be part of the Potsdam Group of sandstones and conglomerate.  I cannot tell if he mapped them as part of the Potsdam, as the scale on Logan’s maps (e.g., Logan, 1865, Map 53,  1:7 920 000 ) defeats one being able to tell whether he mapped the passage beds as part of the Potsdam or the Calciferous.
            
The ‘beds of passage’ were recognized and reported as the passage beds or ‘transition beds’ in the earlier mapping of eastern Ontario in the latter half of the 1800's and early part of the twentieth century by the Geological Survey of Canada.  For example,  Ells (1901) in his report on the Geology of the Ottawa area mentioned “There is no break between the Calciferous which is for the most part a dolomitic limestone, and the Potsdam which is a sandstone. There are from twenty to thirty feet of transition beds in which the sandy part of the latter becomes more calcareous and it is from this portion that most of the fossils which have been described as Potsdam have been obtained.” Ells  (1903) when reporting on rocks  in the Kingston district, Ontario mentions that the Potsdam sandstones “consist for the most part of white quartzite, and these sandstones graduate upward without break into strata which become calcareous till the rock finally passes into a dolomitic limestone which constitutes the Calciferous formation.  Between the sandstone proper and the dolomite there are certain layers known as the transition beds which range in thickness from five  to forty feet, and these are often highly fossiliferous... “.  

Ells mapped the transition beds sometimes as part of the Potsdam and sometimes as part of the Calciferous.  For the area northeast of Perth, Ontario – north towards Carleton Place, and east to Smiths Falls–  Ells (1901, Perth Sheet, Map 789) mapped some rock as Potsdam Sandstone and some rock as Calciferous,  that the Ontario Geological Survey later  mapped as March Formation (Williams and Wolf, 1984, Map P2714).  In the marginal notes Ells stated “The transition beds between the [Potsdam] sandstone and the overlying Calciferous dolomites extend upward in places for a thickness of thirty feet, and render the exact boundaries of the two formations difficult to determine.  They have however been indicated as closely as possible...”.  

In an Appendix to a report by Ells,  Ami (1905) listed and describing fossils from the Potsdam, Beekmantown  (Calciferous), etc. formations on the Perth Sheet. In his report  Ami (1905,  p.  82J, 83J) treated  the Passage Beds as a separate formation between the Potsdam and Beekmantown, and may have been the first to do so for Canada.  Ami was reporting on a fossil Gastropod and commented that “The strata holding these may fairly be described as passage beds between the Potsdam sandstone and the next overlying series: the Beekmantown formations.”

Cushing (1908) proposed the term Theresa Formation  for the transition beds exposed  at  Theresa, New York.  Cushing commented “The Potsdam grades upward into a formation which consists of sandy dolomite layers and beds of weak brown sandstone which are mostly near  the base and are quite like the upper beds of the Potsdam. The line between the two formations is drawn at the base of the first dolomite layer, but in all probability this is not a constant horizon over the district. The name given to the formation is mainly intended for local use and the necessity for its introduction arises from present doubt as to the exact equivalent of the formation elsewhere in the region. When fresh the dolomite is a hard and tough, bluish gray rock, which, however, quickly weathers to iron-stained sandy crusts. All the beds are somewhat sandy.”

The term Theresa was quickly picked up for the United States. Grabau (1909) mentions that Cushing found “in the Theresa quadrangle  from 115 to 215 feet of strata beneath the Black River, and resting disconformably upon the Lower Beekmantown (Theresa formation), which, with its basal sandstone (called Potsdam by Cushing), has a maximum thickness of 140 feet.”  Professor Grabau also made the point that as the Potsdam is “a transgressive overlapping series of strata deposited by a transgressing sea, the basal sand member would naturally rise in the series in the direction of transgression and overlap, and that hence a basal sand is not everywhere of the same age.”  
 
One year later in a New York State Museum Bulletin report on the Geology of the Thousand Islands, Cushing et al. (1910, pages  65-66), when discussing the Theresa Formation commented that “The horizon  seemed the same as, and the beds identical with beds which directly overlie the Potsdam sandstone all across northern New York, a length of outcrop of 150 miles, and which have heretofore been called "passage beds" between  the Potsdam and the Beekmantown, the Beekmantown being the  formation which overlies the Potsdam for much of this distance. ...   It is likely, however, to prove useful as a name for the considerable  thickness of alternating beds everywhere immediately overlie the Potsdam sandstone in northern New York, and which should be mapped  separately.”  Cushing et al. also commented (1910, pages  66-67) that  “According to Ells the Theresa formation outcrops on Howe island [east of Kingston],  and on the  Canadian mainland to a point midway between Gananoque and Kingston. [Royal Soc. Can. Trans., ser. 2, v. 9, § 4, p. 97-108.]   In the district about Kingston, as seen by us in 1908 under Dr Ami's guidance, the Potsdam is certainly  present, though no Theresa was seen.”

The first reports of the Geological Survey of Canada to reference the Theresa formation in New York State were by Johnston (1909, 1911).  On mapping the Pamelia beds on the Simcoe Sheet, Ontario, he compared  the Pamelia beds in Ontario with those in New York State, and mentions (1909, page 99) that in New York below the Pamelia “lies the Theresa formation, supposed to be equivalent to the lower portion of the Beekmantown (Calciferous), and the Potsdam sandstone forms the  base of the series ” and (1911, page 190) “In New York State the limestones of the Black River group pass downward into the Pamelia limestone of Upper Stones River age, which in turn is underlain by the Theresa formation, the  upper member of  which is of early Beekmantown (Calciferous) age.”  Neither the Calciferous (Beekmantown) nor Potsdam were present on the Simcoe Sheet.

Willis (1912) may have applied the Theresa Formation to rocks in Ontario and Quebec.   Under his supervision the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Geological Survey of Canada and the Instituto Geologico de Mexico compiled an Index to the Stratigraphy of North America, with an accompanying Geologic Map of North America.  His map unit 18 includes  the
Lower Cambrian  to Lower Ordovician (Beekmantown), inclusive.  In the text of the publication he reviews Cushing’s references to the Theresa Formation in New York State.   He also discusses the geology of the St. Lawrence Valley, commenting (page 196) “The distribution of the Ordovician, exclusive of the Beekmantown ("Calciferous"), in the St. Lawrence Valley as here mapped is taken from the map sheets of Ontario and Quebec. ... . The Pamelia limestone  and the underlying but unconformable "Theresa formation" have also been traced in the latest work (1908).[a]” His footnote ‘[a]’ references “Ami, H. M. , personal communication, Sept. 1908.”   H. M. Ami was a paleontologist with the Geological Survey of Canada.

Raymond (1912 and 1913a) was the first to clearly use Theresa for the formation in Canada.  Raymond (1912) when discussing the lower part of the Beekmantown rocks at Brockville and Smiths Falls assigned the name Theresa to the formation, commenting “In the vicinity of Brockville and Smiths  Falls the Beekmantown is divisible into two formations. The older formation has two members. The lower part is a rather soft calcareous sandstone, usually thin-bedded. In places, however, the cement is siliceous and the beds very hard ...  Fossils are there fairly common, and the presence of Ophileta complanata, and a gastropod very like Pleurotomaria canadensis indicate the Beekmantown age of the formation. .... The upper member of this formation is a thin-bedded bluish dolomite which weathers to a rusty yellow colour. These beds contain obscure gastropods and crinoidal remains. At Smiths Falls the thickness of the whole formation is above 70 feet, ... This formation appears also in New York state, in the vicinity of Clayton, and has been given the name Theresa by Prof. Gushing. This name may be adopted in Canada also. Above the thin-bedded dolomite of the Theresa there are heavier-bedded limestones and dolomites with a rather large fauna ... found also in the lower part of the Beekmantown section in the Champlain valley ..  It will, however, be necessary to give a new formational name to these beds, and Beauharnois may be suggested.”

Raymond (1913a, p. 139) in a field trip guide to the ‘Ordovician of Montreal and Ottawa’ used the term Theresa Formation for the Ordovician  passage beds for outcrops in Ontario.  He stated: “Theresa. — In some parts of the Ottawa valley the oldest beds of the Beekmantown are composed of reworked Potsdam sand, with a calcareous cement. These beds are therefore softer and weaker than the Potsdam beds.  They contain fossils at several localities, the more common of which are Ophileta complanata and Pleurotomaria canadensis. The upper part of the Theresa is a thin-bedded, gray dolomite, with the same fossils. The  Theresa is absent from the section at Montreal, and is thin near Ottawa, but thickens southward, toward Smiths Falls and Brockville.”
            
It is worth noting that Raymond’s  (1913a) paper is usually cited as the first to divide the Beekmantown Group of the Montreal area into two formations, namely the Theresa  and the overlying Beauharnois.  In fact for the Theresa he was mainly commenting on the Ordovician passage beds that outcrop near Ottawa, Smith Falls and Brockville, and noted that the Theresa is absent at Montreal.  In addition,  it was Raymond’s second paper mentioning the Theresa.

Raymond (1913b)  used “Beauharnois formation, (Beekmantown)” to refer to a formation where specimens of a trilobite could be found on the Island of Montreal.
    
Kindle (1916), in a report on the Ordovician limestones in the vicinity of Kingston, Ontario, commented “Prof. H. P. Cushing visited this area during the progress of his mapping of
the formations on the New York side of the St. Lawrence and has included in his report a reference to the Kingston section. In a preliminary paper on this work Cushing described two new formations, the Pamelia limestone and Theresa dolomite from near the base of the Ordovician section. In the Kingston district Cushing found no evidence of the presence of the Theresa.”

Parks (1922), in a paper discussing the development of stratigraphy and  paleontology in Canada, mentions that Raymond “subdivided the Beekmantown into Theresa and Beauharnois; established the upper age of the Chazy of Ontario and Quebec , calling it the "Aylmer" formation, and subdivided the Black River into Pamelia, Lowville and Black River.”'

Cole (1923, page 11) in a report on Silica in Canada, mentions that “Directly overlying the Potsdam sandstone formation, beds are to be found, in some localities, composed mostly of grains of quartz cemented by a calcareous bond, and placed in the Theresa formation of Beekmantown age.  The beds are considered to be composed of material derived from the Potsdam formation, and in some cases are hard to differentiate from beds of true Potsdam age.”

Wright (1923) in report on the geology of the  Brockville-Mallorytown area, Ontario for the Geological Survey of Canada, includes a Paleozoic Section comparing the rocks of the Brockville-Mallorytown map area with those across the St. Lawrence in the Ogdensburg area, an area mapped by Cushing.   In that Paleozoic section where his description is “Lens-shaped bed of bluish grey dolomite limestone. Very hard, massive, light grey sandstone.  Irregular-bedded, rubbly weathering, calcareous sandy material” Wright places it in the Potsdam for Canada and under Theresa for the USA.  In the text of his report he notes that “Cushing, discussing the area directly across the river, has placed the Potsdam and Theresa formations in the Cambrian...”.

In an unpublished Master of Science thesis correlating the Ordovician in Canada, Phillpotts (1928) adopted Theresa for a rock formation in Eastern Ontario and Beauharnois for a formation in Montreal and in Eastern Ontario, as the parts of the Beekmantown, referencing Raymond (1913a) in his bibliography.

Maddox (1930) in a report by the GSC on the thicknesses of the Ordovician formations in Ontario and Quebec commented “No attempt has been made to subdivide the Beekmantown into the Theresa and the Beauharnois, the lower limit of the Beekmantown being arbitrarily assumed to be where the lowest bed of dolomite occurs in the sandstone.”

Morley E. Wilson (1931a) used the term “Theresa (Transition Beds)” to identify the lower part of the Beekmantown in a table of  Palaeozoic strata of the Ottawa map-area.   Morley E. Wilson (1931b, c) when describing ripple marks in sandstone beds at a quarry near Perth, Ontario, noted that the beds were “formerly known as ‘Transition Beds’, but now called Theresa in New York state.”  He commented (1931b, page 26): “The Potsdam sandstone is succeeded by the sandy dolomitic limestone or limey dolomite of the Beekmantown, the change from the Potsdam to the Beekmantown taking place in most places transitionally, beds of sandstone up to four feet thick alternating with beds of sandy dolomitic limestone. These alternating beds formerly known as "Transition Beds", but now called Theresa in New York state, are usually thin, the maximum thickness so far observed by the writer being 30 to 40 feet in the vicinity of Smiths Falls.”  

In an unpublished Master of Science thesis, Wykes (1931), who had assisted Dr. Morley E. Wilson in the field in 1930,  described the Paleozoic Formations of the Perth Sheet, Ontario as (a) a basal conglomerate (b) Potsdam sandstone,  (c ) Transitional or Theresa beds - sandy dolomites or limestones; (d) Beekmantown Dolomitic limestone.

Parks (1931) followed Raymond in dividing the Beekmantown group in Quebec into the  Theresa and Beauharnois formations.    

Alice E. Wilson made widespread use of the term Theresa for these beds in three papers: (1932a) in an unpublished internal GSC  report on the Palaeozoic rocks of the Thurso map (Quebec and Ontario),   (1932b) in  a Palaeontological Note in the Canadian Field-Naturalist, and (1936) in a paper summarizing of the Ordovician of Ontario and western Quebec and New York,  

 In the unpublished report Wilson (1932a, Page 5, 14) comments  “The Theresa, the sandy phase at the base of the Beekmantown, does not in this region add any information to the question of an unconformity between the Potsdam and the Beekmantown.  The Theresa passes imperceptibly into the Upper beds of the Beekmantown, evidence of a deepening sea.” ... [The Theresa] “has everywhere been recognized in the earlier mapping of eastern Ontario by Ells who designated it as "the passage beds." In New York State the member has been recognized in several quadrangles.  In the Thousand Island region and in the Ogdensburg quadrangle, Cushing did not distinguish any unconformity between the Theresa and the underlying sandstone.”
    
Alice E. Wilson (1932b) in her Palaeontological Note in the Canadian Field-Naturalist commented on outcrops of Theresa formation rock near Westport, Ontario, at Thurso, Quebec and at Montreal, stating  “Cushing's original intention was to consider the Theresa as "passage beds" between the Potsdam and the undoubted Beekmantown. ... The fossils found in these "passage beds" in the Westport and Perth sheets are undoubtedly Beekmantown in age. ...  [T]here are two possibilities, the existence or the non-existence of an unconformity separating the  Potsdam and the Theresa of the Beekmantown age. ... The change in the chemical content of the sediments of the Potsdam and the Beekmantown seas is the record of a change in material brought to the ocean. It must have preceded the change  in deposition. It would seem logical to consider that the change in chemical composition would correspond with the period of erosion elsewhere. Hence the logical place to draw the line in the rocks deposited would be below the first appearance of a change in deposition, that is, the first appearance of dolomite in the matrix of the sand, which would be below these basal Theresa beds.”

Alice E. Wilson (1936) in a paper with the title ‘A Synopsis of the Ordovician of Ontario and western Quebec and the related succession in New York’ commented: “ In eastern Ontario and western Quebec there are two phases of the Beekmantown– the Theresa, or "passage beds," and the overlying calcareous or dolomitic beds, to which Raymond has given the name of Beauharnois.      THERESA - The Theresa  is a thin formation of alternating dolomites and loosely cemented sandstones. Raymond (1913) considers the sandy phase to be the reworked Potsdam sandstone with a calcareous cement. The lower dolomite layers contain considerable sand and grit, but higher up they become a purer, tough, bluish grey dolomite, weathering rusty in spots. These beds pass imperceptibly into the purer dolomite of the upper  Beekmantown.   The Theresa is very thin in the Ottawa valley, but increases in thickness at Smiths Falls and Brockville. ...   The Theresa was first described in New York state, the type locality being at Theresa, Jefferson county, New York, where the division attains a maximum thickness of 80 feet.   ... To the lower member Cushing  (1908) gave the name "Theresa." He considered the Theresa in its most  easterly phase as "passage" beds between the Potsdam sandstone and the overlying Beekmantown.   ... In Ontario Logan recognized these beds as a separate phase and throughout the early Canadian literature they are spoken of as the "passage beds," and as lying above the Potsdam and below the typical Beekmantown.”
    
Notwithstanding her earlier use of the Theresa, Alice E. Wilson (1937b) in a paper describing erosional intervals in the Ottawa area provided a table of formations for the Ottawa area in which she included the March formation above the Nepean formation, without describing or defining the March formation.   Alice E. Wilson (1937a) in an unpublished report of the Geological Survey of Canada on the Geology of the Paleozoic Rocks of the Ottawa Area, signaled her change in thinking, naming the March and Nepean formations.  She commented “It has been the custom in the past to correlate the Palaeozoic rocks of Ontario and Quebec  with those of, New York State and to employ the formational names used in New York. It is believed that in some instances this has clouded the true interpretation.... The word Beekmantown, for instance, sometimes signifies the age in which certain rocks were deposited or sometimes signifies indiscriminately two or three phases of rocks deposited at different period of time. ... The boundary between the Nepean and March formations is stratigraphically slightly higher than the division formerly drawn between the Potsdam and the Theresa. ... First, the two formations may have been deposited by two distinct marine invasions. The contact of the Nepean with the March formation does not exactly coincide with the contact between the Potsdam and Theresa of New York. Raymond’s interpretation that the Theresa is reworked Potsdam, while not stating it assumes an erosional interval after the deposition of the Potsdam and before that of the Theresa sea. The incoming sea would rework the upper sand of the Potsdam and redeposit it. The upper layers of sandstone, then, would be the deposition of the later invasion. Evidences of such erosion might well be very obscure. It is practically impossible to find the exact line between sand laid upon sand. The existence or non-existence of an unconformity between the Potsdam and the Theresa in New York has been discussed by Cushing and others. The New York Geological  Survey considers both Potsdam and Theresa as divisions of Upper Cambrian time.  In Ontario all evidence corroborates Raymond's interpretation that at least the upper beds are of Ordovician age. But the assumption of an erosional  contact is not the only interpretation possible.”

Further, Alice E. Wilson ( 1938a,  1938b, 1940a, 1940b, 1941a, 1941b, 1941c, 1942, 1946a)  in a series of nine maps on  the Paleozoic Geology of Eastern Ontario and Western Quebec,  published between 1938 and 1946 by the Geological Survey of Canada, used the term ‘March Formation’ instead of the Theresa formation for one of her mapped units.  The  marginal notes to her maps contained a description of the March Formation, with the descriptions on the nine maps being nearly identical.  This is her description from her (1938b) Map 414a entitled ‘Ottawa Sheet  (West Half) Carleton and Hull Counties, Ontario and Quebec’: “The MARCH (3) is a thin formation of Lower Ordovician age lying conformably upon the Nepean. It is composed of thick beds of interstratified grey sandstones with a calcareous cement and a sandy blue-grey dolomites, both weathering a rusty brown.  Transitional between the Nepean below and the Oxford above, it has been defined as a formation because its characteristic features are persistent throughout the region.  It is a water bearing horizon. The contact with the Nepean is placed at the first dolomitic layer, but it is difficult to locate in many places because the resistant sandstone layers are often widely exposed and are very like those of the upper Nepean. The upper layers grade into the Oxford. It has an estimated thickness of 25 to 30 feet.”  Map 557a, Map 558a and Map 662a contain the statement that the March  “grades into the overlying Oxford and for this reason is considered to be of Beekmantown age.”  Map 710a adds  the sentence “The few fossils in it indicate a Beekmantown age” while Map  852a adds  the sentence “The formation contains fossils of Beekmantown age.”
            
The following map shows Geologic maps where the Paleozoic Geology was mapped by Alice E. Wilson.   Eight of the maps mentioned in the previous paragraph are shown, plus two additional maps where Alice E. Wilson was  not the sole author.  It is worth noting that four of Alice E. Wilson’s maps cover parts of the Province of Quebec and that the geologists in Quebec never adopted March as the name of the formation (other than in an unpublished Ph.D. thesis at McGill University by Dean (1962) in which he used March for the basal formation of the Beekmantown  and Beauharnois for the upper formation). .

Alice E. Wilson ( 1946b) in her Memoir on the ‘Geology  of  the  Ottawa - St. Lawrence Lowland, Ontario and Quebec” defined the March formation, naming it  for March Township (south of Ottawa) where it outcrops.  She noted (1948, page 16-17 ) that “The Nepean sandstone, then, may or may not have been deposited at the same time as the Potsdam of New York, and within the Nepean itself there is no definite evidence that it is of Upper Cambrian age.  The possibility is recognized, but the probability  is that the sandstone was deposited in earliest Ordovician time as the basal phase of an advancing sea. The March formation, with a few of the upper sandstone layers of the Nepean sandstone, was correlated by Raymond (1913, p. 139) with the Theresa of New York, and considered by him to be the base of the Ordovician in eastern Ontario. The position of the New York Theresa has been redefined, and the name is now restricted to an Upper Cambrian formation having its type locality in New York. Fossils indicate that the March is of Ordovician age.”   As she believed  that her  Nepean and March in the Ottawa - St. Lawrence Lowland, Ontario and Quebec,  were Ordovician in age  while the Potsdam and Theresa in New York were Cambrian, she rejected the name Theresa for the rock unit she had mapped in Ontario and Quebec.

In Eastern Ontario the designation March Formation was used for these beds from 1948 to at least 1991, relying on Alice E. Wilson’s (1946) memoir.  For example [1] Keith (1949) in an Ontario Department of Mines publication on sandstone as a  source of silica sands in southeastern Ontario employed the term March Formation for that part of the Beekmantown overlying the Potsdam; [2]  Wynne-Edwards (1967) in his memoir on the  Westport map Area, Ontario comments “The March Formation represents a transitional unit between the sandstone of the Nepean and the overlying Oxford dolomite (Wilson, 1946).” [3] Wolf and Dalrymple (1985) in a paper discussing the  Covey Hill Formation and Nepean Formation mention “the overlying March Formation and its New York equivalent.”  Interesting, Greggs and  Gorman (1976) in a publication on the  Geology of the Thousand Islands (Ontario side), describe the features of the March formation, but mention that  “the March Formation is the exact lithological and stratigraphical equivalent to the Theresa [of New York].”  In the early 1980s the Ontario Geological Survey re-mapped the Paleozoic rocks of Eastern Ontario (e.g.,  Williams  and Wolf, 1984a, Map P. 2724, Paleozoic Geology of the Perth Area; Williams  and Wolf, 1984b, Map P. 2725, Paleozoic Geology of the Carleton Place Area), employing exclusively March Formation.   The name March Formation is still in use by the Ontario Geological Survey (e.g., Béland Otis (2017,  figure 22.1; 2018, Figure 22.1, both generalized bedrock geology maps).
           
Greggs and Gorman (1976) make an interesting observation that may help explain where Alice E. Wilson went wrong. They comment : “A further confusion in determining the age of the Nepean Formation developed as a consequence of the pronounced similarity between the upper March and the Nepean sandstones. This miscorrelation of the March and Nepean led Keith (1949, p. 8) and Kirwan (1963, p. 109) to conclude that the "Nepean (Potsdam)" in the areas immediately to the east of the Frontenac Axis was of Beekmantown age (Lower Ordovician). This age determination was based on the discovery by Keith (1949) of several species of Lower Ordovician gastropods in outcrops mapped as Potsdam by Baker (1922) and Wright (1923), and later by Wilson (1938, 1946) as Nepean. The outcrop yielding the Ordovician gastropods was actually upper March. The very great lithological similarity of the Nepean and upper March sandstones makes the error of age determination understandable.”   Baker and Wright were always going to map the transition beds as Potsdam.  Alice E. Wilson misidentifying beds as Nepean rather than her March, would have affected her analysis.

The best description of the naming controversy can be found in Bernstein (1992) and Salad Hersi et al. (2002, 2003).   Bernstein (1992, page 2683) comments “Contrary to established procedure (see Schenck and Miiller 194I), [Alice E. ]Wilson, like many of her contemporaries, regarded formations as time-restricted units. Thus, despite considering the Nepean and March correlatives of the Potsdam and Theresa in Quebec and New York State, she retained the terms Nepean and March because the Potsdam and Theresa formations were regarded as Cambrian in age at their type localities.”    Bernstein (1992) rejected March and suggested that Theresa be used in Ontario and Quebec.    There seems to be general agreement that Alice E. Wilson applied the wrong criteria to name the Nepean and March Formations.  For example, Professor George Dix (2021, personal communication) has commented  “Even in the 1930/40s when Wilson recognized that the “Nepean” and “March” strata were younger, the international stratigraphic code did not allow for age as a reason for establishing new formation names.”     Another criticism of Wilson would be that from Logan to Ells to Raymond the field officers of the Geological Survey of Canada viewed the Potsdam sandstone in Ontario and Quebec as an extension of the Potsdam sandstone in Upper New York State, and viewed the overlying beds as correlating with the overlying beds in New York State, and all of Logan, Ells and Raymond had looked at the rocks in Ontario, Quebec and New York State.

Since Bernstein (1992) the trend in Ontario has been to replace March with Theresa, as the same formation is believed to be present in New York, Ontario and Quebec, and the name Theresa was in use first.  Before COVID struck Catherine Béland Otis (2017, 2018, 2019)  of the Ontario Geological Survey  was mapping  the Paleozoic geology of eastern Ontario.   In each of her reports she has provided a figure with the competing terminologies for Paleozoic strata  in eastern Ontario, with her left column providing  the nomenclature currently used by the Ontario Geological Survey, while the column on the right is the nomenclature proposed in more recent publications.  I expect that she will recommend replacing March with Theresa, as Professor Dix at Carleton University, Professor Arnott at the University of Ottawa, and their students, use Theresa in their publications.   In addition Béland Otis (2017) commented that “recent academic studies suggest that the geological history of the Ottawa Embayment is closely related to that of adjacent jurisdictions, such as Quebec and northern New York....; therefore, any revision of the stratigraphic nomenclature for eastern Ontario should take these similarities into account (per Articles 7c and 7e of NACSN (2005)).”

In the past twenty years most of the articles on the March/Theresa deal with whether the March/Theresa conformably or unconformably overlies the Potsdam Group (for the recent participants to the debate see the papers mentioned in the References and Suggested Reading to my June 1, 2021 blog posting) and where to place the boundary.  Salad Hersi et al. (2002, page 422) set out the background for the debate:  “Wilson (1937) hypothesized that the Cambrian–Ordovician Nepean Formation in the Ottawa  region  possibly  contains  an  eroded  interval  at  the Cambro–Ordovician boundary.    In a later and widely acknowledged  publication,  Wilson  (1946)  documented  the  Nepean–March contact as transitional, and like Cushing (1908), placed it at the base of the first dolomitic or calcareous bed.”  The opposing views of the participants to the debate cannot easily be summarized or reconciled.  Lowe et al. (2019) take the position that “In the southeastern Ottawa graben, the change from clastic (Keeseville) to carbonate-clastic strata (Theresa) is conformable and gradational, whereas in the west it is sharp and conformable, but locally unconformable in areas on the hanging-wall blocks of regional normal faults (e.g., the Gloucester and Ste. Justine faults) throughout the northern Ottawa graben”.   Professor Dix, Professor Salad Hersi and Ed Landing are not in  agreement with that sentence, with their papers supporting a  disconformable Potsdam–Theresa  contact  at Ottawa and a regional post-Potsdam erosional surface (see Dix et al., 2004; Salad Hersi et  al.  2002 a,  2002 b; Landing, 2007; Landing et al., 2019).      Béland Otis (2018, page 22-6) commented that “In the Ottawa area, the lower contact of the Beekmantown Group with the underlying Potsdam Group seems conformable and gradational. As observed in both cores, the lower contact of the March (Theresa) Formation with the Nepean (Keeseville) Formation is interbedded over a few metres. Exact definition of this contact is therefore somewhat arbitrary,...”.

Williams (1991), among others,  has noted that “Quartz sandstones of the March Formation are lithologically similar to those of the underlying Nepean Formation. ... Dolostones of the March Formation are lithologically similar to those of the overlying Oxford Formation.”   As a consequence, mapping the location of the  upper and lower boundaries is often not free from doubt. In my June 4th blog posting I mention  the  outcrop at Phillipsville, Ontario.  Some have mapped  it as Nepean; others, as March/Theresa.   Two publications provide measured sections, with the first placing the whole of the section in the Theresa, while the second  reports 3.55 meters of March Formation at the top, underlain by 3.1 meters of Nepean Formation.   A paper by Bond and Greggs (1976) in which they discuss and attempt to redefine the March - Oxford boundary exemplifies the problem in differentiating between the March and Oxford formations.  Bond and Greggs (1976) provide a measured section for an outcrop   1.6 km east of Port Elmsley, Lanark County, Ontario.  They show  0.8 m of Oxford Formation underlain by 0.8 m of   March Formation.   Williams and Wolf (1984a) mapped the outcrop as March formation.

Williams (1991, pages 48 - 57) has the best summary of the rocks that make up the March formation, and provides a number of measured sections throughout Eastern Ontario where the March is present.  Professor Dix (2020) of Carleton University has prepared a short YouTube video on a Theresa Formation outcrop in the Ottawa area.   I suspect that Selleck’s (1984) paper is the best for the stratigraphy  and sedimentology of the Theresa Formation, but it was published in Northeastern Geology,  is not readily available, and I have not been able to obtain a copy.   Bjerstedt  and Erickson (1989), Erickson (1993), and Erickson  and Bjerstedt (1993) have reported on Trace fossils and bioturbation in the Theresa Formation.  Wilson (1956, Plate 1, No. 2, 3) contains photographs of two gastropods found in the March Formation.
 
Husinec and Donaldson (2014) and Selleck (1978, 1983) provide field trip guides with stops at Theresa formation outcrops  in New York State.  

For those in the Ottawa area Quentin Gall (2010) collated a field trip guide with a stop at the outcrop behind the Walmart in Kanata.   The rocks directly behind Walmart are the underlying Nepean Formation sandstones while the rocks on the other side of Kanata Avenue are March/Theresa formation dolomitic carbonate beds as well as quartz-rich sandstone beds. 
   
In Lanark County good outcrops of March/Theresa rock can be found south of Mississippi Lake along Drummond Concession 7, along Highway 15 just north of Smiths Falls,   along highway 7 north of Perth, and along county road 43 east of Perth heading towards Port Elmsley and on to Smiths Falls.

Husinec and Donaldson (2014) comment that  “The maximum estimated thickness of the Theresa Formation in northwest New York varies from 28 m (Selleck, 1984) to 43 m (Cushing, 1916).”   Williams (1991, page 55) mentions that “The thickness of the March Formation [in Ontario] shows a  general southeastward increase, ranging from 6.6 metres in the Carleton Place map area (31F/1) to 63.7 metres in the Alexandria map area (31G/7). ... Reduced thicknesses occur in the southern part of the Ottawa-St. Lawrence Lowland in the vicinity of prominent Precambrian topographic highs.”

Selleck (1978) provided a three part division of the Theresa, which  Selleck (1983) concisely  describes as “Theresa Formation consists of three informal subdivisions: lower Theresa thin-bedded calcareous siltstones of intrashelf lagoon origin; middle Theresa interbedded bioturbated dolomitic sandstones and cross-laminated quartz sandstones deposited in a shallow subtidal to low tidal flat environment; and upper Theresa sandy dolostones, dolomitic sandstones and calcareous siltstones of high tidal flat origin.”  Bjerstedt  and   Erickson (1989) provide a composite section for the Theresa (as it is not exposed in its entirety), dividing it into three parts: a  lower section consists of “gray, medium- to thick-bedded, calcareous, fine-grained sandstone” ... the lower 10 m of [which] is extremely bioturbated, and individual sedimentation units can be seen in centimeter(s)-thick, scour-based, horizontally laminated sandstones with burrowed tops”;  the middle section “consists of gray, thick-bedded to massive, poorly sorted, calcareous to dolomitic, medium- to coarse-grained sandstone”;   the upper section consists of “white, meter-thick, thin- to medium-bedded, fine- to medium-grained, siliceous to calcareous, planar and herringbone cross-bedded sandstone.” They interpreted the lithographic change to have “resulted from migration of low intertidal sand flats across a shallow inner shelf.”    Béland Otis (2017, 2018, 2019) shows a  three part division of the Theresa but appears to be mapping the March/Theresa as one unit and has  not defined her parts A, B, C.

Salad Hersi and  Dix (2004) divided the Theresa formation of Ontario and Quebec into three  depositional units (A, B and C) which they believe “record a vertical peritidal-subtidal-peritidal depositional cycle. Unit A contains clastic-dominated sand shoal/flat facies and also is well represented in SW Quebec, beyond the eastern limits of the [Ottawa] embayment. Unit B contains predominantly normal to marginal marine subtidal bioclastic dolostones that are restricted to the eastern and central parts of the [Ottawa] embayment, as well as farther to the east in SW Quebec. Unit C contains marginal marine clastic and carbonate facies. The clastic content  of Unit C decreases eastward (basinward) and intertidal to subtidal sandy to pure carbonates become predominant in the region south of Montreal.”
   
Greggs and Bond (1971) provide two reference sections for the March Formation at Brockville (which is not in  March Township), which they divided into two parts: [A] a lowermost 90 ft (27.5 m) section of  blue-gray sandstone rich in conodonts, with beds having gradational tops and bottoms, in which individual burrows are evident , apparently deposited in a shallow, offshore marine environment such as a tidal or sub-tidal flat; and [B] an upper part, the dominant lithology of which is a white or buff-colored, medium-grained, fairly massive sandstone, with bioturbation not as severe in these beds as it is in the lower sandstones.

Bond and  Greggs (1973) describe six reference sections for the March Formation near Brockville, Ontario (as the March is not  exposed in its entirety) in order to make a complete section. They report  that “Two dominant lithologies characterize the formation: a lower succession of highly bioturbated, blue-gray dolomitic quartz arenites, and an upper unit of pale yellow-gray to yellow-brown, calcareous and siliceous, quartz arenites. ...Deposition of the  upper, yellow-gray sandstones of the March Formation  appears to have  occurred in a shallower marine environment than  the lower blue-gray sandstones.” 

Béland Otis (2017) in her mapping of the Ottawa area reported that the March Formation “is composed of interbedded quartz arenite, dolomitic and calcareous arenite to quartz wacke and sandy dolomudstone to dolograinstone. The quartz beds are quite similar to that of the underlying Nepean Formation (Keeseville Formation). The other lithofacies tend to be thin to medium bedded and grey to brown, with some greenish weathering associated with glauconite. Calcite-filled vugs and gastropods were observed.”

In my June 4th blog posting I mentioned that in 1979 John Cass had authored  a Master’s thesis   entitled ‘Paleoenvironmental interpretation of the Beekmantown Group within the Ottawa Basin’.  Cass rejected Wilson’s renaming the Theresa formation as the March formation.     He had a unique view of what we now call the  Theresa , breaking it down into the Theresa and Buck Bridge Formation, with the Buck Bridge formation consisting of a lower Heuvelton member and an upper March member.   While this is a unique interpretation for Canada, he was following Chapman’s (1915, p. 289) breakdown of transition beds in Upper New York into the Theresa, Heuevelton and Bucks Bridge.   He provides a few measured sections, including one at  Phillipsville, Ontario.

Giles  (1976), in an  unpublished doctoral thesis on the Beekmantown Group within the Ottawa Basin,  also rejected Wilson's name March Formation.  His proposed Beekmantown Group  includes four formations: Prescott, Crystal Rock, Oxford Mills, and Laggan.   He suggested that his Lower Prescott could be correlated with the Theresa formation of Quebec, and his Crystal Rock, Oxford Mills, and Laggan with the Beuharnois formation in Quebec.  While no one has followed Giles’ nomenclature he did make incisive comments on where to place the boundary between the Potsdam and the Theresa.  At page 249 of his thesis he designates the Iroquois quarry as his principal reference section for his Prescott formation and Crystal Rock formation, and provides a measured section.  The quarry is at Iroquois, along the St. Lawrence, two thirds of the way between Brockville and Morrisburg.

Christopher Brett
Ottawa 

Addendum (September 29, 2021):  Catherine Béland Otis of the Ontario Geological Survey  was kind enough to send me two of Selleck’s papers from Northeastern Geology:
Selleck, Bruce W. , 1984.
Stratigraphy  and sedimentology of the Theresa Formation   (Cambrian-Ordovician)     in  northwestern  New York State.  Northeastern  Geology, 6: 118 - 129
Selleck, Bruce W., 1987
Origin of Voids in Peritidal Facies of the Theresa Formation and Ogdensburg Dolostone (Lower Ordovician), New York and Ontario.  Northeastern Geology, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 76-88  
       
Selleck’s (1984) paper is worth reading.  One point he makes is that “In those areas [in New York State] where the Theresa Formation overlaps Proterozoic quartzite ridges, boulder and cobble conglomerates are common within the lower and middle portions of the formation.”   Further, a location in New York which he believes to be Theresa conglomerate has been mapped by others as Potsdam conglomerate.

 Selleck (1987) believes that the calcite filled voids in the Theresa  originated as anhydrite nodules and  anhydrite clasts where dissolution of the evaporite mineral generated the voids, later  partially to completely filled with crystalline calcite ( and minor quartz, dolomite, Pyrite, sphalerite and fluorite) .  This ties in with the rounded, nodular pseudomorphs of evaporite minerals in the coastal sabkha facies of the underlying Nepean Formation .  
   
I have also added the references to Johnston (1909, 1911), Willis (1912), Parks (1922), Phillpotts (1928) and  Salad Hersi and Dix (2004).

References and Suggested Reading            

Ami, H. M., 1905.
 Preliminary  lists of fossil organic remains from the Potsdam, Beekmantown  (Calciferous), Chazy, Black River, Trenton,  Utica, and  Pleistocene  formations  comprised  within the Perth Sheet (No. 119)  in  eastern Ontario. Geological  Survey of Canada, Annual Report, New Series, Vol. 14, Part J, pp. 80 - 89

Béland Otis, Catherine, 2017    
Paleozoic Mapping of Eastern Ontario, Ontario Geological Survey, Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 2017, Open File Report 6333
http://www.geologyontario.mndm.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/pub/data/imaging/ofr6333//ofr6333.pdf

Béland Otis, Catherine, 2018
Paleozoic Geology of Eastern Ontario: Ottawa Area. Paleozoic Geology and Energy Studies  Project SO-18-006 , pages 22-1 to 22-10,  Ontario Geological Survey Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 2018, OFR 6350

Béland Otis, Catherine, 2019
Paleozoic Geology of Eastern Ontario: Arnprior–Quyon Area, pages 20-1 to 20-10, Project SO-19-005,  Ontario Geological Survey Summary of Field Work and Other Activities, 2019, OFR 6360


Bernstein, Lawrence, 1992
A revised lithostratigraphy of the Lower-Middle Ordovician Beekmantown Group, St.
Lawrence Lowlands,  Quebec and  Ontario.  Can. J. Earth Sci. 29, 2677-2694    
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/e92-212


Bjerstedt, T. W. and J. M. Erickson. 1989.
Trace fossils and bioturbation in peritidal facies of the Potsdam-Theresa Formations (Cambrian-Ordovician), Northwest Adirondacks. Palaios, 4:203–224.
   
Bond, I.J., and Greggs, R.G. 1973.
 Revision of the March Formation (Tremadocian) in southeastern Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 10 : 1140–1155.    10.1139/e73-098
https://cdnsciencepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/e73-098

Bond, I.J., and Greggs, R.G. 1976
Revision of the Oxford Formation (Arenig) of southeastern Ontario and northern New York State
 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 13(1):19-26 DOI:10.1139/e76-002

Brett, Christopher P., 2018a
Alice E. Wilson’s Scientific Papers, Maps, Field Trip Guide and Children’s Book on Geology - Part 1. Blog Posting  October 17, 2018

Brett, Christopher P., 2018b
Alice E. Wilson’s Scientific Papers, Maps, Field Trip Guide and Children’s Book on Geology - Part 2.  Blog posting October 20, 2018 
http://fossilslanark.blogspot.com/2018/10/alice-e-wilsons-scientific-papers-maps_20.html

Byrne, A. W. 1958.
The stratigraphy and palaeontology  of the Beeckmantown Group in the St. Lawrence Lowlands,
Quebec. Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec
https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/k3569792v

Cass, John I. , 1979
Paleoenvironmental interpretation of the Beekmantown Group within the Ottawa Basin. Thesis, Master of Science, University of Ottawa.  189 pages plus 90 page Appendix. https://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/8394/1/MK43988.PDF
http://hdl.handle.net/10393/8394

Cole, L. H., 1923
Silica in Canada its occurrence, exploitation, and uses. Part I -.Eastern Canada.  Canada Mines Branch, Publication 555, 1923, 135 pages (9 sheets), https://doi.org/10.4095/307756

Cushing, H. P., 1908
Lower portion of the Paleozoic section in Northwestern New York,  Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., Vol. XIX, 1908, at p. 155-  176 at 159, 160
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/113691#page/205/mode/1up

Cushing,  H. P.,  H.Le Roy Fairchild, R. Ruedemann, C.H. Smyth, 1910
Geology of the Thousand Islands Region: Alexandria Bay, Cape Vincent, Clayton, Grindstone and Theresa Quadrangles,  New York, Museum Bulletin 145,  194 pages
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/109608#page/7/mode/1up


Dean, Ronald S.,  1962
A study  of  St. Lawrence Lowland Shales.  Unpublished  Ph.D.  thesis, McGill University,
Mont real,  Quebec
https://central.bac-lac.gc.ca/.item?id=TC-QMM-115085&op=pdf&app=Library&oclc_number=893571877   
 

Dix, George, 2020
Theresa Formation  (Marine Shoreface).  A YouTube video [2:56 minutes ; 7 Oct 2020] 
https://youtu.be/EJz12HnOEg0 

Dix, George R.,  Salad Hersi, Osman, and  Nowlan, Godfrey S.,  2004
The Potsdam-Beekmantown Group boundary, Nepean Formation type section (Ottawa, Ontario): a cryptic sequence boundary, not a conformable transition, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2004, 41(8): 897-902,  http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/e04-040

Ells, R. W., 1895
The Potsdam and Calciferous formations of Quebec and eastern Ontario: Royal Society of Canada,  Proc. Trans.,  12,  IV, 21-30, 1895. 
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/40846#page/635/mode/1up


Ells, R. W., 1901
Parts of Counties of Renfrew, Lanark, Lennox and Addington, Frontenac and Carleton (Perth Sheet, No. 110, Geological Survey of Canada, Map 789. Scale 4 miles to 1 inch
   
Ells, R W,  1902       
Report on the geology and natural resources of the area included in the map of the City of Ottawa and vicinity . Geological Survey of Canada, Annual Report, part G, separate report 741
       
Ellls , R W,  1903
Notes on some interesting rock-contacts in the Kingston district, Ontario. Trans. Roy. Soc. Can., 2nd ser., Vol. IX, sec. 4, pp. 97-108, 1903.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/41836#page/817/mode/1up

Ells, R W,  1904
 Report on the geology of a portion of eastern Ontario (to accompany map-sheet no. 119), Geological Survey of Canada, Annual Report vol. 14 no. J

Erickson, J. Mark, 1993
Cambro-Ordovician stratigraphy, sedimentation, and ichnobiology of the St. Lawrence Lowlands; Frontenac Arch to the Champlain Valley of New York.  Trip A3(1) New York State Geological Association Field Trip Guidebook,  p.68-95

Erickson, J. M. and T. W. Bjerstedt. 1993
Traces Fossils and Stratigraphy in the Potsdam and Theresa Formations of the St. Lawrence Lowland;~New York. Trip A-3(2). New York State Geological Association Field Trip Guidebook, pages 97 - 119. 

Gall, Quentin, 2010   
Geology of the Ottawa Area. Ottawa-Gatineau Geoheritage Project.  Field trip. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/525bf175e4b00f431dc971c0/t/525ca7f6e4b048ac9edb6cb0/1381804022438/Geology+Of+The+Ottawa+Area.pdf

Giles, P.  S. 1976.
Stratigraphy,  petrology,  and  diagenesis  of Beekmantown carbonate  rocks. Ph.D. thesis,  University of Western Ontario,  London,  Ontario
https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/digitizedtheses/904/

Grabau, AW, 1909
Physical and Faunal Evolution of North America during Ordovicic, Siluric and Early Devonic Time , Journal of Geology, Vol. 9, pages 209 -252
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/621606

Greggs, Robert G.  and Ivor  J. Bond, 1971
Conodonts from the March and Oxford Formations in the Brockville Area, Ontario. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 8, 1455
   
Greggs, R.G. and W.A. Gorman, 1976
Geology of the Thousand Islands. Parks Canada
http://www.oliverkilian.com/ecology/thousand-islands/island-insights/geology/rocks.html
“the March Formation is the exact lithological and stratigraphical equivalent to the Theresa.”

Husinec, Antun  and J Allan Donaldson,  2014
Lower Paleozoic Sedimentary Succession of the St. Lawrence River Valley, New York and Ontario, in : Geology of the Northwestern Adirondacks and St. Lawrence River Valley (pp.1-28)  86th NEGSA Annual Meeting Field Guidebook, Chapter: A-1. Publisher: New York State Geological Association

Johnston, W. A.,  1909
Simcoe Sheet, pages. 97 - 102, in Geological Survey of Canada, Summary Report for the year 1908
   
Johnston, W. A. , 1911
Simcoe District, Ontario. Pages 188-192 , in Geological Survey of Canada, Summary Report of the Department of Mines, Geological Survey of Canada for the year 1910
   
Keith, M. L., 1949
Sandstone as a  source of silica sands in southeastern Ontario; Ontario Dept. Mines, Vol.55, pt.5, 36p. (published 1949). Accompanied by Map 1946-9, scale l   inch to 2  miles
http://www.geologyontario.mndmf.gov.on.ca/mndmfiles/pub/data/imaging/ARV55/ARV55.pdf

Kindle, E. M., 1916
The Ordovician Limestones of the Kingston Area.,  Appendix 1, pages 37-44 to M.B. Baker’s paper The Geology of Kingston and Vicinity, Twenty-Fifth Annual Report of the Ontario Bureau of Mines, 1916, being  Volume 25, Part 3
           
Landing, Ed, 2007
Ediacaran-Ordovician of East Laurentia- Geologic Setting and Controls on Deposition along the New York Promontory.  Pages 5-24 in  Ediacaran-Ordovician of East Laurentia - S. W. Ford Memorial Volume.  New York State Museum Bulletin 510, 94 pages        https://exhibitions.nysm.nysed.gov/publications/bulletin/510-16505.pdf

Landing, E., Salad Hersi, O.,  Amati, L., Westrop, S.R., Franzi, D.A., 2019
Early Paleozoic rifting and reactivation of a passive-margin rift: Insights from detrital zircon provenance signatures of the Potsdam Group, Ottawa graben: Comment. GSA Bulletin; March/April 2019; v. 131; no. 3/4; p. 695–698; https://doi.org/10.1130/B35104.1; published online 25 January 2019.


Livingstone, K. W. , Hill, P. A., Wilson, Alice E. and  Kirwan, J. L., 1974,
Geology, Arnprior, Ontario;. Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 1363A, 1 sheet, scale 1:50,000   [Precambrian geology by K. W. Livingstone, P. A. Hill and others 1963, 1964, 1965, compiled by K. W. Livingstone 1965. Paleozoic geology by Alice E. Wilson, compiled by J. L. Kirwan 1963. Revised by P. A. Hill, 1972.]
  https://doi.org/10.4095/109148


Logan, W. E. 1852.
On the geology of the Beauharnois  region.  Geological   Survey of Canada,   Report of Progress
1851-1852, pp. 5-56.         

Logan, W. E., 1863
The Geology  of Canada. Geological  Survey  of Canada,  Report  of Progress from
its Commencement to 1863.

Logan, W.E.,  1865   
Geological map of Canada and the adjacent regions, including parts of other British provinces and of the United States; Geological Survey of Canada, Multicoloured, Geological Map 53,  http://www.science.gc.ca/eic/site/063.nsf/vwimages/175_22.jpg/$file/175_22.jpg
 

Lowe, D.G., Arnott, R.W.C., Chiarenzelli, J.R., and Rainbird, R.H., 2018,
Early Paleozoic rifting and reactivation of a passive-margin rift: Insights from detrital zircon provenance signatures of the Potsdam Group, Ottawa graben: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 130, no. 7/8, p. 1377–1396, https:// doi .org /10.1130 /B31749 .1 .

Lowe, D.G., Arnott, R.W.C., Chiarenzelli, J.R., and Rainbird, R.H., 2019,
Early Paleozoic rifting and reactivation of a passive-margin rift: Insights from detrital zircon provenance signatures of the Potsdam Group, Ottawa graben: Reply. Geological Society of America Bulletin, March/April 2019, v. 131, no. 3/4, pages 699-703; published online January 25, 2019.  https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article/131/3-4/699/568492/Early-Paleozoic-rifting-and-reactivation-of-a


Maddox, D C, 1930
Thicknesses of the Ordovician formations in Ontario and Quebec, , in Summary report, 1930, part D; Geological Survey of Canada; Geological Survey of Canada, Summary Report 1930, pt. D, 1931 p. 49-57, https://doi.org/10.4095/102042

 Miller, A. H.;  C. A. French, and M. E. Wilson, 1929
Geophysical Survey of the Hull-Gloucester and Hazeldean Faults. Part IV in Geological Survey of Canada,   Memoir 165, Studies  of Geophysical Methods, 1928 and 1929
       
Parks, W. A., 1912
REPORT on the Building and Ornamental Stones of Canada, Volume 1 [Ontario], Canada, Department of Mines, Mines Branch, 376 pages


Parks, William Arthur , 1922
Presidential Address [discussing the history of Stratigraphy and Paleontology in Canada], Proceedings and Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada  Series 3, Volume 16, Section IV, pages 1- 46  https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/41928#page/778/mode/1up

Parks, W.A., 1931
 Natural Gas in the St. Lawrence Valley, Quebec; Que. Bur. Mines, Ann. Rept. 1930, Pt.D, pp. 3-98, 1931.

Phillpotts, Dennis M., 1928
Correlation of the Ordovician in Canada. Master of Science Thesis,  University of Alberta.  https://archive.org/details/correlationoford00phil

Raymond, P.E., 1912
Ordovician of the Ottawa Valley.  Geological Survey , Canada , summary Report 1911, pp 351-356   https://doi.org/10.4095/292550

Raymond, P.E.,  1913 a
 Ordovician of Montreal and Ottawa. 12th International Geological Congress, Montreal, Que., Guidebook 3, pp. 137-160.  https://archive.org/details/guidebooksofexcu06inte_0 
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/129908#page/3/mode/1up   

Raymond, P.E.,  1913b
Notes on some new and old trilobites in the Victoria Memorial Museum. Geological Survey of Canada, Victoria Memorial Museum, Bulletin 1, pp. 33 — 39.  October 23, 1913    

Raymond, P.E. 1914.
L'Ordovicien a Montreal et a Ottawa. 12th International Geological Congress, Montreal, Que., Guidebook 3, pp. 147-174.

Reinhardt, E.W., Wilson, A.E, Liberty, B.A., 1973
 Carleton Place, GSC Map 1362A.  Scale 1:50,000. Precambrian Geology and Compilation by E.W. Reinhardt, 1963, 1969, 1972. Paleozoic Geology By A. E. Wilson, 1946.  Paleozoic compilation by B. A. Liberty, 1963, with minor changes by Reinhardt, 1972. 

Sandford, B.V. , and Quillion , R.G.  1959
Subsurface stratigraphy of upper Cambrian rocks in Southwestern Ontario. Canada Geological Survey, Paper 58-12,  34 pages   https://doi.org/10.4095/101213 [Sandford  and Quillion (1959) applied the term Theresa Formation for subsurface stratigraphy in Southwestern Ontario, overlying the Potsdam, and as an equivalent to the Theresa in New York State.]

Salad Hersi, Osman and George R. Dix, 2004
 Shelf –Wide tectonic And Eustatic Control on Sedimentation of Mixed Carbonate-Clastic Sequence:Early Ordovician Theresa Formation of Eastern Ontario, Canada.
  Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Convention At Calgary, Alberta.
Abstract at: https://geoconvention.com/wp-content/uploads/abstracts/2004/052S0128.pdf
 

Salad Hersi, O., Lavoie, D., and Nowlan, G.S., 2002a
 Stratigraphy of the Upper Cambrian Strites Pond Formation, Philipsburg Group, southern Quebec, and its implications for the Cambrian platform in eastern Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 50 : 542–565.


Salad  Hersi, O.,  Lavoie,  D.,  Hilowle  Mohamed,  A., and  Nowlan,G.S. , 2002b
Subaerial unconformity at the Potsdam-Beekmantown contact  in  the  Quebec  Reentrant:  regional  significance  for  the Laurentian  continental  margin  history.  Bulletin  of  Canadian
Petroleum Geology, 50 : 419–440                                           
   
Salad Hersi, O.;  D. Lavoie, and G.S. Nowlan, 2003
Reappraisal of the Beekmantown Group sedimentology and stratigraphy, Montréal area,
southwestern Quebec: implications for understanding the depositional evolution of the
Lower–Middle Ordovician Laurentian passive margin of eastern Canada.  Can. J. Earth Sci. 40: 149–176 


Selleck, B. W. 1978. 
Paleoenvironments of the Potsdam Sandstone and Theresa Formation   of   the   southwestern
St. Lawrence Lowlands. New  York State  Geological  Association, 50th Annual Meeting  Fieldtrip  Guidebook, Syracuse, N.Y., pp. 173 - 184

Selleck, B. W., 1983.
Lower Ordovician Stratigraphy and sedimentology,  southwestern  St.  Lawrence  Lowlands.  New  York  State Geological  Association, 55th Annual  Meeting Fieldtrip  Guidebook,
Potsdam, N.Y.,  pp. 9.1 -9.9.    Also available as a Google Earth Field Trip at NYSGA1983M.kml from http://ottohmuller.com/nysga2ge/FrontPage.html  

Selleck, B. W. 1984.
Stratigraphy  and sedimentology of the Theresa Formation   (Cambrian-Ordovician)     in  northwestern  New York State.  Northeastern  Geology, 6: 118 - 129

Selleck, Bruce W., 1987
Origin of Voids in Peritidal Facies of the Theresa Formation and Ogdensburg Dolostone (Lower Ordovician), New York and Ontario.  Northeastern Geology, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 76-88
   
Winder, C. G.,1961
Lexicon of Paleozoic names in southwestern Ontario, University of Toronto Press, 121 pages
Theresa Formation: Upper Cambrian,  at page 110

Williams,  D.A.  1991. 
Paleozoic  Geology  of  the  Ottawa-St.  Lawrence  Lowland,  Southern  Ontario;  Ontario  Geological  Survey,  Open  File  Report  5770,  292p
    

Williams, D.A. and Wolf, R. R. 1984a
Paleozoic Geology of the Perth Area, Southern Ontario. Ontario Geological Survey. Map P 2724. Scale 1:50,000. Geology 1982


Williams, D.A., and Wolf, R.R., 1984 b
Paleozoic Geology of the Carleton Place Area, Southern Ontario; Ontario Geological Survey, Map P. 2725, Geological Series-Preliminary Map, scale 1:50 000. Geology 1982.

Willis,  Bailey, 1912   
Index to the Stratigraphy of North America. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1912, 894 pages
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/116335#page/202/mode/1up

Wilson, Alice E., 1932a
The Palaeozoic Rocks of the Thurso Area.  Unpublished report of the Geological Survey of Canada
http://gq.mines.gouv.qc.ca/documents/examine/GM15285/GM15285.pdf
   
Wilson, Alice E., 1932b
Palaeontological Notes; Canadian Field-Naturalist. 46, pp. 133-140.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/89295#page/163/mode/1up
           
Wilson, Alice E., 1936:
 A Synopsis of the Ordovician of Ontario and western Quebec and the related succession in New York: in Contributions to the study of the Ordovician of Ontario and Quebec;  Geol. Survey of Canada Memoir  202, Pub. 2427, pp. 1–20, 1936.

Wilson, Alice E. 1937a
Geology of the Paleozoic Rocks of the Ottawa Area.  Unpublished report of the Geological Survey of Canada

Wilson, Alice E., 1937b
Erosional Intervals Indicated by Contacts in the Vicinity of Ottawa, Ontario.  Transactions, Royal Society of Canada, Section IV, pages 45 -60

 Wilson, Alice E.,  1938a: 
Ottawa Sheet, (East Half) , Carleton and Hull Counties, Ontario and Quebec, Geological Survey of Canada,  Map 413A, Scale 1 inch to 1 mile, Geology by A. E. Wilson, 1935
https://doi.org/10.4095/107511 Nepean, March , Oxford

Wilson, Alice E.,  1938b
Ottawa Sheet, (West  Half) , Carleton and Hull Counties, Ontario and Quebec, Geological Survey of Canada, Map 414A,  Scale 1 inch to 1 mile, Geology by A. E. Wilson, 1935
https://doi.org/10.4095/107545    Nepean, March , Oxford

Wilson, Alice E.,  1940a
Casselman, Russell, Dundas, Stormont, Prescott, Carleton, and Papineau Counties, Ontario and Québec; Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 587A, 1940,   miles, Geology by A. E. Wilson, 1935, 1936, and 1937   https://doi.org/10.4095/107369    Nepean, March , Oxford
              
Wilson, Alice E.,  1940b
 Nepean, Carleton, Lanark, Grenville, Dundas, Gatineau and Papineau Counties, Ontario and Québec;  Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 588A, 1940, 1 sheet, 1 inch to 2 miles. Geology by A. E. Wilson, 1935, 1936, and 1937,  https://doi.org/10.4095/107428
Nepean, March , Oxford

Wilson, Alice E.,  1941a
Valleyfield, Québec and Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 660A, 1941, Geology by A. E. Wilson, 1938  and 1939  https://doi.org/10.4095/107850
Nepean, March [Beauharnois] , Oxford
       
Wilson, Alice E., 1941b
L'Orignal, Ontario and Québec; Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 662A, 1 sheet, 1 inch to 2 miles, Geology by A. E. Wilson, 1937  and 1938 https://doi.org/10.4095/107972   Nepean, March [Beauharnois] , Oxford

Wilson, A. E., 1941c
Maxville, Ontario and Québec; Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 661A, 1941, 1 sheet, 1 inch to 2 miles, Geology by A. E. Wilson, 1929 and 1937  https://doi.org/10.4095/107973     Nepean, March [Beauharnois] , Oxford
          
Wilson, A. E., 1942
Prescott, Ontario; Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 710A, 1942, 1 sheet, Geology by A.E. Wilson 1939, 1940  https://doi.org/10.4095/107616  Nepean, March , Oxford

Wilson, A. E., 1946a
Ottawa-Cornwall , Ontario and Quebec, Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 852A,  Scale 1 inch to 4 Miles, Geology by A. E. Wilson, 1929 and 1935 to 1940  
https://doi.org/10.4095/107544  Nepean, March , Oxford

Wilson, Alice E. 1946b
 Geology  of  the  Ottawa - St. Lawrence Lowland, Ontario and Quebec.  Geological  Survey  of
Canada, Memoir  241. 65 pages
       
Wilson, Alice E., 1954:
 Ottawa, Carleton, Gatineau, and Papineau Counties, Ontario and Québec; Geological Survey of Canada, "A" Series Map 1038A, 1954, 1 sheet, https://doi.org/10.4095/107547
   
Wilson, Alice E., 1956
 A Guide to the Geology of the Ottawa District, Volume 70, 1,  The Canadian Field-Naturalist, 73 pages, including five plates, and 1 map sheet
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/90128#page/9/mode/1up

Wilson, Morley E., 1931a
Geology of Ottawa district, pages 192-196, chapter 2 in Geophysical Survey of the Hull-Gloucester and Hazeldean Faults. By A. H. Miller, C. A. French, and M. E. Wilson; in Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 165, Studies  of Geophysical Methods, 1928 and 1929
Eve, A S; Gilchrist, L; Keys, D A; Mawdsley, J B; Swartz, J H;   227 pages

Wilson, Morley E., 1931b
Ripple marks near Perth, Lanark County, Ontario: Canadian Field-Naturalist, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 25-27, 3 figs., February 1931; 
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/89041#page/41/mode/1up

Wilson, Morley E., 1931c
Ripple Marks in the Lower Palaeozoic of the Ottawa Valley,  Canadian Mining Journal, Volume 52, 347-348

Wilson, Morley E. and  Dugas, Jean,  1961,
Map 1089A, Geology, Perth, Lanark and Leeds Counties, Ontario, Geological Survey of Canada; Geology by Morley E. Wilson, 1930 and Jean Dugas, 1949; Descriptive notes by Jean Dugas.
https://doi.org/10.4095/107951
       
Wright, J. F.,   1923
 Brockville-mallorytown map area, Ontario.  Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 134, 1923, 63 pages ), https://doi.org/10.4095/100859 

Wolf, Rainer R and Robert W. Dalrymple, 1985
Sedimentology of the Cambro-Ordovician Sandstones of Eastern Ontario.  Geoscience Research Grant Program Summary of Research 1984-1985. Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper 127, pages 112-118.


Wykes, Eric Robinson, 1931
The petrology of some crystalline rocks of the Perth sheet,  McGill University, Master of Science Thesis,  52 pages, including maps. 
https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/n870zt47m

Wynne-Edwards, H. R., 1967
 Westport map Area, Ontario, With Special Emphasis On the Precambrian Rocks, Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir 346, 142 pages
http://geoscan.nrcan.gc.ca/starweb/geoscan/servlet.starweb?path=geoscan/fulle.web&search1=R=100533  )