Tuesday, 29 December 2015

More Evidence of Microbial Mats in Potsdam Sandstone near Newboro, Eastern Ontario

Winter has arrived in Eastern Ontario.  Eight centimeters of snow fell last night and more is forecast for today.   I’m glad that on December 26th I took the opportunity offered by the absence of snow  to revisit the area around Newboro and to look at outcrops near Westport.  I’d wanted to check for glacial meltwater eroded outcrops (and found some) and wanted to look again for further evidence of microbial mats.  Below I report on three outcrops  near Newboro.   The first two outcrops are mapped as Potsdam Group sandstone.  All of the outcrops are about  four kilometers south of the Rideau Lakes Fault. 

The silver ruler in the following photographs is one meter (39 inches long).  The blue ruler is 12 inches (30 cm) long.

First: An Outcrop Revisited


This is one of the outcrops from my last blog posting, the one mentioned under the subheading
‘Biofilm Structures’ where I provided  two photographs showing  a bedding parallel view of distorted laminations in quartz sandstone.    Below are photographs of additional distorted sandstone laminations visible at this outcrop.  The structures are difficult to envisage in sandstone unless the beds were bound by microbial mats.   The first photograph  may show a mat roll up structure.


Second:  Distorted Layers in Flat Lying Beds of Potsdam Sandstone


Below are photographs showing a distorted bed that is up to about 12 inches (30 cm) thick contained  within a sequence of flat lying beds of sandstone.




This distorted bed contains broken,  folded and crinkled layers, plus layers that appear to have been thrust over or under other layers.    I believe that this distorted bed represents pre-lithification  distortion of  biomats and stromatolitic layers in the sandstone, probably caused by seismic activity along the Rideau Lakes Fault.    Seismic activity caused rupturing and folding of the unconsolidated sediment, but the biofilms preserved the laminations in the strata. 

The mechanism that I have proposed to account for the  30 cm wide distorted bed near Newboro is analogous to the model proposed by Donaldson and Chiarenzelli (2004) to account  for the meter thick convoluted layer in the Nepean sandstone outcrops in Kanata, Ontario, photographs of which were included in my  November 4,  2015 blog posting.    Both outcrops display soft-sediment deformation   in  sandstone, where seismic activity is the likely cause of the deformation.  
   

Third:  A Badly Weathered Outcrop



I’ve included this outcrop because it has weathered in such a manner that it looks like the outcrop in Kanata, in a field off the Old Quarry Trail, photographs of which were included in my  November 4,  2015 blog posting.   It is missing the convoluted folds shown at the outcrop in Kanata, but otherwise the pattern of weathering is the same.  Both the outcrop in Kanata and this outcrop show repetitive, weathered out, thin layers in sandstone.   Below are photographs of the side view and the top view of the outcrop near Newboro.



I did not have my rock pick or sledgehammer with me on the 26th, but pulled a piece off the third outcrop, took it home, and cracked it with a small sledge.  It’s sandstone, badly weathered sandstone, but sandstone.

Christopher Brett
Perth, Ontario
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Addendum (January 5, 2016):         

In the comment below Howard Allen of Calgary has suggested that the second outcrop may represent evaporite accumulation, subsequent solution and collapse.  Others have reported on evaporites in Potsdam sandstone, and have suggested that they are responsible for observed structures in the sandstone. 

Wolf and Dalrymple (1984) mention that “At one locality near Phillipsville, a zone of disrupted laminae caps the burrowed beds.  The nature of the laminae suggests collapse into small cavities. .... The disrupted laminae which cap the cycle at the Phillipsville locality may represent the collapse of overlying sand into cavities formed by the dissolution of evaporites, such as gypsum or halite (B.W. Selleck, Colgate University, personal communication, 1983).” 

Wolf and Dalrymple (1985) mention that “the tops of cycles are disrupted by soft-sediment deformation, due either to the leaching of evaporites or to (earthquake induced?) liquifaction. ....Evaporite moulds in one outcrop of this facies near Gananoque... give evidence of elevated salinities, a finding that is compatible with an evaporite-solution origin of the soft-sediment deformation features.”

Donaldson and Hilowle (2002) report for an outcrop of quartz arenites of the Nepean Formation in Kanata that they observed “evaporite pseudomorphs, including silica-replaced rosettes of barite and/or gypsum” and “a distinctive unit of synsedimentary breccia inferred to have formed in response to dissolution of a layer of bedded evaporites”.

Donaldson and Chiarenzelli (2004) suggest,  for one of the outcrops of Potsdam sandstone (Nepean Formation)  at Kanata, that “a few beds that stand out as glassy markers display abrupt truncations (Figure 6), suggesting that they may have been penecontemporaneously cemented, and then locally disrupted by erosional undercutting of unconsolidated substrate, localized upwards pressure associated with dewatering, or dissolution of intercalated evaporites.”    

Sanford and Arnott (2010) reported that the  “Imperial Oil Ltd., Laggan No.1 borehole encountered numerous gypsum interbeds throughout the upper half of the Nepean Formation.”  In addition they noted that “Fairly extensive brecciation in the GSC Lebreton No.1 borehole, and to a lesser extent in the GSC Russell No.1 borehole, might also suggest the initial presence of minor halite in those areas, with subsequent dissolution and collapse.”  Further, “The widespread paucity of normal marine fossils, except for local occurrences of trace fossils, represents evidence of elevated salinity throughout the Ottawa embayment.   The occurrence of stromatolites, which can survive and even thrive in hypersaline conditions, is also a good indicator of evaporitic conditions.”

(Added: September 28, 2016)
David Lowe (2015, 2016), in his work on the Potsdam strata has recognized six siliciclastic paleoenvironments: (a) braided fluvial, (b) ephemeral fluvial, (c) aeolian erg, (d) coastal sabkha, (e) tide-dominated marine and (f) open-coast tidal flat.   Wikipedia mentions that “Sabkhas are supratidal, forming along arid coastlines and are characterized by evaporite-carbonate deposits with some siliciclastics. Sabkhas form subaerial, prograding and shoaling-upward sequences .”   The sabkha facies of the Potsdam Group are found in sandstone that  in Ontario we call the Nepean Formation, in Quebec they  call the Cairnside and in New York State they call the Keeseville.

Wednesday, 23 December 2015

Dewatering Structures, Biofilm Structures, Glacial Striae and Chatter Marks in Potsdam Sandstone near Newboro, Eastern Ontario

It has been a remarkably warm December for Eastern Ontario and we have yet to receive anything more than a light dusting of snow.  Yesterday, December 22nd, it was 8 degrees Celsius (46 degrees Fahrenheit), and  I couldn’t help but take the morning off work to do some Christmas shopping and to look at some outcrops. 

Below are photographs that I took yesterday of glacially polished  outcrops of Potsdam Sandstone a few kilometers north of Newboro, Ontario.    The sandstone has most recently been mapped as the Nepean Formation of the Potsdam Group by the Ontario Geological Survey and as the Covey Hill Formation of the Potsdam Group by the Geological Survey of Canada.

Dewatering Structures

The first three photographs show parts of three outcrops that are within about 270 feet (80 meters) of each other.  The first and the second photos show excellent examples of small dewatering structures.  The third photo is less convincing, but likely shows small dewatering structures.

     
In the second photo it is not clear what has weathered out of the surface layer to produce the pockmarked surface.   Many of the holes are rounded or peanut shaped.  One possible interpretation is that they represent gas bubbles trapped below a biomat.   Below are three more photographs of the pockmarked surface.   It appears that many of the bubbles have merged into chains or patches, resulting in  structure analogous to Kinneyia.


Biofilm Structures

The next two photographs provide a bedding parallel view of distorted laminations in quartz sandstone.  I believe the laminations to be biofilm structures in the quartz sandstone (rather than a distorted dewatering structure), where interlayered microbial mats provided cohesion during deformation.

It is possible that these distorted laminations are seismites.  The outcrops are about four kilometers south of the Rideau Lakes Fault and about the same distance from the soft-sediment deformation structures (seismites) mentioned in my October 22,  2015 blog posting.

Glacial Striae and Chatter Marks

Glacial striae and chatter marks were present on the surfaces of a number of the outcrops that I looked at.   In addition a few of the outcrops show prominent noses pointing in the same direction as the striae and chatter marks.   The next two photos provide examples of the glacial striae and chatter marks.


Possible Sandstone Dikes in Sandstone (or a Torn Microbial Mat)


Christopher Brett
Perth, Ontario       

Tuesday, 15 December 2015

Problematic Markings (Dubious Fossils) in Potsdam Sandstone

Below are two photographs that I took over two years ago of one side of a loose slab of Potsdam sandstone that I noticed at the quarry at Ellisville in Eastern Ontario.    The photographed side has a yellow coating that is probably Limonite.   All other sides of the slab are the pink and beige colours of the Covey Hill formation sandstone, Potsdam Group that is found in this quarry. 





Questions that have puzzled me for the last few years include: Are the raised forms fossils?  If the raised forms are fossils, are they body fossils or trace fossils?  and  If the raised forms aren’t fossils, how were they formed?   I’ve not found a convincing answer to any of those questions. My initial impression was that the raised forms were dubious fossils (markings possibly not of biogenic origin), and that is still how I would classify them.

Interestingly, I’ve found some photographs of somewhat similar problematic forms in two papers authored or co-authored by the late Dr. Hans Hofmann in rocks reported to be of Ediacaran age.  See:

Hofmann, H.J., 1988,  Synopsis of Precambrian Fossil Occurrences in North America, Chapter 4 in Geology of the Precambrian Superior and Grenville Provinces and  Precambrian Fossils in North America, (Co-ord.)  S. B. Lucas and M. R. St-Onge, Geological Survey of Canada, Geology of Canada, No. 7, p. 271-376, Plate 2E at pages 302-303.

Hofmann, H.J., Mountjoy, E.W. and Teitz, M.W., 1991
Ediacaran fossils and dubiofossils, Miette Group of Mount Fitzwilliam area, British Columbia; Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 28(10), p. 1541-1552, Plates 8C, 8D,  8E, 8F, 8J.
www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/e91-138

Below I’ve provided Plate 2E from Hofmann (1988) which was originally plate 8F in Hofmann, Mountjoy and Teitz (1991).   The scale bar is 1 cm.




Below I’ve  provided Plates 8C, 8D,  8E and 8J from  Hofmann, Mountjoy and Teitz (1991).



Copyright in the photographs shown in the Plates belongs to National Research Council of Canada and Canadian Science Publishing. They  are reproduced under license from NRC Research Press.

Hofmann, Mountjoy and Teitz (1991) found and reported on a number of disc and elliptical shaped fossils (including Charnodiscus and Nimbia) that are worth reading their article to look at (but don’t resemble anything that I found), a vermiform structure that they equated with Zolotytsia, and seven types of dubiofossils which they classified alphabetically under the headings from Dubiofossil A to Dubiofossil G.

Hofmann, Mountjoy and Teitz (1991)  describe plate 8F as showing “Two partly overlapping vermiform markings.... The two specimens juxtaposed in such a way as to give the impression of being wound around each other ... or lying contiguous side-by-side for at least half their lengths.”   They  mention that “The markings appear to [be] those of some limp, soft-bodied cylindrical organism, or part of an organism, rather than a trace fossil. ... Structures of comparable physical consistency appear to be the much more regular spiraliform fossil Zolotytsia of Fedonkin (1985) and the Cylindrichnus of Glaessner (1969).

Plates 8C and 8D show two specimens which were discussed under the heading Dubiofossil C and were described as a tapering  “rectilinear frond-like structure” with rounded end, which they noted “resemble an unnamed frond-like impression from the Ediacaran... [and] also are like the proximal portions of the stems of Charnodiscus oppositus ... and may represent the stalk of similar organisms.” 

Plates 8E and 8J they assigned to Dubiofossil D and described as a “Cleavage reliefs of short, undulating furrow and corresponding ridges,... some portions having pinch-and-swell appearance.  Cross sections indistinctly round.”  They remarked that  the specimens “may be burrows comparable to Phanolites or Torrowangea.”
   
I’m not prepared to speculate as to whether the raised markings on the slab that I photographed could be body fossils or trace fossils, and if they are such, what they resemble.  All I can say is that the markings on the slab that I photographed are somewhat similar to and as problematic as the dubiofossils identified by Hofmann, Mountjoy and Teitz (1991). 

Second Specimen


Below are photographs of a loose specimen of Potsdam sandstone that I collected over about two years ago in Burgess Ward of Tay Valley Township, Lanark County from a waste pile resulting from the digging of drainage ditch along Stanley Road.   Both Nepean sandstone and Covey Hill sandstone of the Potsdam Group have been mapped in this area.  I believe the specimen to be Nepean sandstone as numerous other specimens from the same drainage ditch display U-shaped burrows. 


The circular, elliptical and spheroidal markings, which are composed of the same sandstone as the host, are problematic.   Are they concretions? Trace fossils? 

Christopher Brett
Perth, Ontario